Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:29:58.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of Postdischarge Infection on Surgical Wound Infection Rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

K. Reimer ,
C. Gleed  and
L.E. Nicolle
K. Reimer
Affiliation:
Office of Infection Control, Calgary General Hospital, and the Departments of Medicine and Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
C. Gleed
Affiliation:
Office of Infection Control, Calgary General Hospital, and the Departments of Medicine and Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
L.E. Nicolle*
Affiliation:
Office of Infection Control, Calgary General Hospital, and the Departments of Medicine and Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
*
Infection Control Unit, MS-675D, Health Sciences Centre, 820 Sherbrooke Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1R9, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We undertook a study of postdischarge infections to assess the reliability of a surgical wound surveillance program in a 930-bed teaching hospital. During a six-month period, a subset of operations performed each day was randomly selected and patients interviewed by telephone one month postsurgery using a standard set of questions. The infection rate for all patients contacted directly postdischarge was 5.4%, whereas the surgical wound infection rate determined for all procedures through the standard hospital program was 1.5%. For day-surgery patients, who are not routinely followed in the hospital surveillance program, 8 (7.8%) of 103 patients contacted had infection. Thus, the overall surgical infection rate determined in this study was over three times higher than that calculated using standard surveillance. A reliable method for identifying postdischarge wound infections is necessary to ensure accurate surgical wound infection rates.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 8 , Issue 6 , June 1987 , pp. 237 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Haley, RW, Culver, DH, White, JW, et al: The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol 1985; 121:182–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Rosendorf, LL, Octavio, J, Estes, JP: Effect of methods of postdischarge wound infection surveillance on reported infection rates. Am J Infect Control 1983; 11(6):226–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Burns, SJ, Dippe, SE: Postoperative wound infections detected during hospitalization and after discharge in a community hospital. Am J Infect Control 1982; 10:60–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Condon, RE, Schulte, WJ, Malangoni, MA, et al: Effectiveness of a surgical wound surveillance program. Arch Surg 1983; 118(3):303–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Cruse, PJE, Foord, R: The epidemiology of wound infection: A ten-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds. Surg Clin North Am 1980; 60:27–40.Google Scholar
6.Stoll, P, Joseph, P, Underwood, M: Outpatient patient surgery: Is surveillance necessary? Abstracted APIC Conference, Las Vegas, 1986.Google Scholar