Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:17:05.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of changing reflexive to clinician-ordered Clostridioides difficile polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for indeterminate cases: Cost savings without associated adverse events

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2020

Eva L. Sullivan Open the ORCID record for Eva L. Sullivan [Opens in a new window] ,
Rohit Majumdar ,
Courtney Ortiz ,
Patricia K. Riggs  and
Nancy F. Crum-Cianflone
Eva L. Sullivan*
Affiliation:
Pharmacy Department, Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, California
Rohit Majumdar
Affiliation:
Internal Medicine Department, Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, California
Courtney Ortiz
Affiliation:
Pharmacy Department, Scripps Green Hospital, San Diego, California
Patricia K. Riggs
Affiliation:
Internal Medicine Department, Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, California
Nancy F. Crum-Cianflone
Affiliation:
Internal Medicine Department, Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, California Infectious Disease Division, Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, California
*
Author for correspondence: Eva L. Sullivan, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate changing Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) testing among inpatients with indeterminate enzyme immunoassay (EIA) results (antigen+/toxin−) from reflexive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing to clinician-ordered PCR testing.

Design:

Multicenter, before-and-after, quasi-experimental study.

Setting:

Four large urban tertiary-care hospitals.

Methods:

We evaluated two 6-month periods before and after an intervention. The primary study outcome was the change in the number of CDI diagnoses between periods. Secondary outcomes included the number of PCR tests performed, adverse events, and healthcare cost savings.

Results:

In total, 500 EIA-indeterminate C. difficile test results were evaluated: 281 before the intervention and 219 thereafter. CDI was diagnosed by PCR among EIA-indeterminate cases in 182 in the preintervention period versus 94 patients in the postintervention period (48% reduction; P < .01). PCR testing was performed in 99.6% of indeterminate cases (280 of 281; 1 not performed due to an inhibitor) in the preintervention period versus 66% (144 of 219) in the postintervention period (34% reduction; P < .01). We observed no differences between study periods in 30-day all-cause (P = .96), GI-related (P = .93), or C. difficile (P = .47) readmissions, nor in 30-day C. difficile infections (P > .99). No patient without a PCR test in the postintervention period and not treated was later diagnosed with CDI. Each reflexive PCR test not performed led to a cost savings of $4,498 per patient.

Conclusions:

Applying diagnostic stewardship to C. difficile PCR testing in the inpatient setting led to significant reductions in both testing and cases. Changing the C. difficile PCR testing algorithm for EIA-indeterminate cases from reflexive to clinician-required ordering resulted in valuable cost savings without associated adverse events.

Type
Original Article
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 41 , Issue 6 , June 2020 , pp. 684 - 690
Copyright
© 2020 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION. This information was presented as a poster (abstract no. 683588) at IDWeek 2019 on October 5, 2019, in Washington, DC.

References

Lessa, FC, Mu, Y, Bamberg, WM, et al.Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States. N Engl J Med 2015;372:825–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magill, SS, Edwards, JR, Bamberg, W, et al.Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care-associated infections. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1198–1208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, S, Palazuelos-Munoz, S, Balsells, EM, Nair, H, Chit, A, Kyaw, MH. Cost of hospital management of Clostridium difficile infection in United States-a meta-analysis and modelling study. BMC Infect Dis 2016;16:447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, LC, Gerding, DN, Johnson, S, et al.Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults and children: 2017 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clin Infect Dis 2018;66:e1–e48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcalá, L, Sánchez-Cambronero, L, Catalán, MP, et al.Comparison of three commercial methods for rapid detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B from fecal specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:3833–3835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastwood, K, Else, P, Charlett, A, Wilcox, M. Comparison of nine commercially available Clostridium difficile toxin detection assays, a real-time PCR assay for C. difficile tcdB, and a glutamate dehydrogenase detection assay to cytotoxin testing and cytotoxigenic culture methods. J Clin Microbiol 2009;47:3211–3217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humpries, RM, Uslan, DZ, Rubin, Z. Performance of Clostridium difficile toxin enzyme immunoassay and nucleic acid amplification tests stratified by patient disease severity. J Clin Microbiol 2013;51;869–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, CV, Edwards, JR, Cohen, J, et al.Effect of nucleic acid amplification testing on population-based incidence rates of Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis 2013;57:1304–1307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koo, HL, Van, JN, Zhao, M, et al.Real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of asymptomatic Clostridium difficile colonization and rising C. difficile–associated disease rates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014;35:667–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polage, CR, Solnick, JV, Cohen, SH. Nosocomial diarrhea: evaluation and treatment of causes other than Clostridium difficile. Clin Infect Dis 2012;55:982–989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, KA, Malani, AN. Laxative use and testing for Clostridium difficile in hospitalized adults: an opportunity to improve diagnostic stewardship. Am J Infect Control 2019;47;170–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loo, VG, Bourgault, AM, Poirier, L, et al.Host and pathogen factors for Clostridium difficile infection and colonization. New Engl J Med 2011;365;1693–1703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zacharioudakis, IM, Zervou, FN, Pliakos, EE, Ziakas, PD, Mylonakis, E. Colonization with toxinogenic C. difficile upon hospital admission, and risk of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenter 2015;110:381–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, BB, Buffie, CG, Carter, RA, et al.Loss of microbiota-mediated colonization resistance to Clostridium difficile infection with oral vancomycin compared with metronidazole. J Infect Dis 2015;212:1656–1665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawley, TD, Clare, S, Walker, AW, et al.Antibiotic treatment of Clostridium difficile carrier mice triggers a supershedder state, spore-mediated transmission, and severe disease in immunocompromised hosts. Infect Immun 2009;77:3661–3669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abad, C, Fearday, A, Safdar, N.Adverse effects of isolation in hospitalized patients: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect 2010;76:97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hospital-acquired condition (HAC) reduction program. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services website. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/Value-Based-Programs/HAC/Hospital-Acquired-Conditions.html. Accessed August 9, 2019.Google Scholar
TECHLAB C. DIFF QUICK CHEK COMPLETE [package insert]. Blacksburg, Virginia; Abbott; 2019.Google Scholar
BD MAX Cdiff Assay [package insert]. Québec, Canada: BD Diagnostics; 2013.Google Scholar
Surveillance for C. difficile, MRSA, and other drug-resistant infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/acute-care-hospital/cdiff-mrsa/index.html. Accessed August 9, 2019.Google Scholar
Ellison, A. Average hospital expenses per inpatient day across 50 states. Beckerʼs Hospital CFO Report. https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/average-hospital-expenses-per-inpatient-day-across-50-states.html. Published 2019. Accessed August 9, 2019.Google Scholar
Peterson, LR, Manson, RU, Paule, SM, et al.Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in stool samples by real-time polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of C. difficile–associated diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis 2007;45:1152–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longtin, Y, Trottier, S, Brochu, G, et al.Impact of the type of diagnostic assay on Clostridium difficile infection and complication rates in a mandatory reporting program. Clin Infect Dis 2013;56:67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, E, de Jong, AS, Bartels, CJ, van der Rijt-van den Biggelaar, C, Melchers, WJ, Sturm, PD. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of a real-time PCR for Clostridium difficile toxin A and B genes. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2012;31:2219–2225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fong, KS, Fatica, C, Hall, G, et al.Impact of PCR testing for Clostridium difficile on incident rates and potential on public reporting: is the playing field level? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:932–933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polage, CR, Gyorke, CE, Kennedy, MA, et al.Overdiagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection in the molecular test era. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175;1792–1801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, I, Leeming, JP, Reynolds, R, Ibrahim, I, Darley, E. Clinical relevance of a positive molecular test in the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection. J Hosp Infect 2013;84:311–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Origüen, J, Corbella, L, Orellana, MÁ, et al.Comparison of the clinical course of Clostridium difficile in glutamate dehydrogenase-positive toxin-negative patients diagnosed by PCR to those with a positive toxin test. Clin Microbiol Infect 2018;24:414–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaulieu, C, Dionne, LL, Julien, AS, Longtin, Y. Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with Clostridium difficile infection diagnosed by PCR versus a three-step algorithm. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014;20:1067–1073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleming, MS, Hess, O, Albert, HL, et al.Test stewardship, frequency and fidelity: impact on reported hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019;40:710–712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed