Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:03:40.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors Associated with Hand Hygiene Compliance at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital

Part of: BARRY FARR AWARD RECIPIENTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Benjamin Kowitt ,
Julie Jefferson  and
Leonard A. Mermel
Benjamin Kowitt
Affiliation:
Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
Julie Jefferson
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Infection Control, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island Program in Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
Leonard A. Mermel*
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Infection Control, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
*
Division of Infectious Diseases, Rhode Island Hospital, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI 02903 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective.

To identify factors associated with hand hygiene compliance during a multiyear period of intervention.

Design.

Observational study.

Setting.

A 719-bed tertiary care teaching hospital.

Participants.

Nursing, physician, technical, and support staff.

Methods.

Light-duty staff performed hand hygiene observations during the period July 2008-December 2012. Infection control implemented hospital-wide hand hygiene initiatives, including education modules; posters and table tents; feedback to units, medical directors and the executive board; and an increased number of automated alcohol hand hygiene product dispensers.

Results.

There were 161,526 unique observations; overall compliance was 83%. Significant differences in compliance were observed between physician staff (78%) and support staff (69%) compared with nursing staff (84%). Pediatric units (84%) and intensive care units (84%) had higher compliance than did medical (82%) and surgical units (81%). These findings persisted in the controlled multivariate model for noncompliance. Additional factors found to be significant in the model included greater compliance when healthcare workers were leaving patient rooms, when the patient was under contact precautions, and during the evening shift. The overall rate of compliance increased from 60% in the first year of observation to a peak of 96% in the fourth year, and it decreased to 89% in the final year, with significant improvements occurring in each of the 4 professional categories.

Conclusions.

A multipronged hand hygiene initiative is effective in increasing compliance rates among all categories of hospital workers. We identified a variety of factors associated with increased compliance. Additionally, we note the importance of continuous interventions in maintaining high compliance rates.

Type
Original Article
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 34 , Issue 11 , November 2013 , pp. 1146 - 1152
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Pittet, D, Allegranzi, B, Boyce, J. The World Health Organization guidelines on hand hygiene in health care and their consensus recommendations. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:611–622.Google Scholar
2.Larson, EL. APIC guideline for handwashing and hand antisepsis in health care settings. Am J Infect Control 1995;23:251–269.Google Scholar
3.Pittet, D, Mourouga, P, Perneger, TV. Compliance with handwashing in a teaching hospital. Ann Int Med 1999;130:126–130.Google Scholar
4.Pittet, D, Hugonnet, S, Harbarth, S, et al. Effectiveness of a hospital-wide programme to improve compliance with hand hygiene. Lancet 2000;356:1307–1312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Lipsett, PA, Swoboda, SM. Handwashing compliance depends on professional status. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2001;2:241–245.Google Scholar
6.O'Boyle, CA, Henly, SJ, Larson, E. Understanding adherence to hand hygiene recommendations: the theory of planned behavior. Am J Infect Control 2001;29:352–360.Google Scholar
7.Hugonnet, S, Perneger, TV, Pittet, D. Alcohol-based handrub improves compliance with hand hygiene in intensive care units. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1037.Google Scholar
8.Arenas, MD, Sanchez-Paya, J, Barrii, G, et al. A multicentric survey of the practice of hand hygiene in haemodialysis units: factors affecting compliance. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005;20:1164–1171.Google Scholar
9.Rosenthal, VD, Guzman, S, Safdar, N. Reduction in nosocomial infection with improved hand hygiene in intensive care units of a tertiary care hospital in Argentina. Am J Infect Control 2005;33:392–397.Google Scholar
10.Novoa, AM, Pi-Sunyer, T, Sala, M, Molins, E, Castells, X. Evaluation of hand hygiene adherence in a tertiary hospital. Am J Infect Control 2007;35:676–683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Pan, A, Mondello, P, Posfay-Barbe, K, et al. Hand hygiene and glove use behavior in an Italian hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:1099–1102.Google Scholar
12.Larson, E, Killien, M. Factors influencing handwashing behavior of patient care personnel. Am J Infect Control 1982;10:93–99.Google Scholar
13.Larson, E, Kretzer, EK. Compliance with handwashing and barrier precautions. J Hosp Infect 1995;30(Suppl):88–106.Google Scholar
14.Maury, E, Alzieu, M, Baudei, JL, et al. Availability of an alcohol solution can improve hand disinfection compliance in an intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:324–327.Google Scholar
15.Bischoff, WE, Reynolds, TM, Sessler, CN, Edmond, MB, Wenzel, RP. Handwashing compliance by health care workers: the impact of introducing an accessible, alcohol-based hand antiseptic. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1017–1021.Google Scholar
16.Voss, A, Widmer, AF. No time for handwashing!? handwashing versus alcoholic rub: can we afford 100% compliance? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:205–208.Google Scholar
17.Dorsey, ST, Cydulka, RK, Emerman, CL. Is handwashing teachable? failure to improve handwashing behavior in an urban emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 1996;3:360–365.Google Scholar
18.Mayer, JA, Dubbert, PM, Miller, M, Burkett, PA, Chapman, SW. Increasing handwashing in an intensive care unit. Infect Control 1986;7:259–262.Google Scholar
19.Berhe, M, Edmond, MB, Bearman, G. Measurement and feedback of infection control process measures in the intensive care unit: impact on compliance. Am J Infect Control 2006;34:537–539.Google Scholar
20.Sax, H, Allegranzi, B, Uçkay, I, Larson, E, Boyce, J, Pittet, D. “My five moments for hand hygiene:” a user-centred design approach to understand, train, monitor and report hand hygiene. J Hosp Infect 2007;67:9–21.Google Scholar