Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:23:45.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficacy of Environmental Measures in Reducing Potentially Infectious Bioaerosols During Sputum Induction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Dick Menzies ,
Neill Adhikari ,
Marie Arietta  and
Vivian Loo
Dick Menzies*
Affiliation:
Montreal Chest Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Respiratory Epidemiology Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Neill Adhikari
Affiliation:
Montreal Chest Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Respiratory Epidemiology Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Marie Arietta
Affiliation:
Respiratory Epidemiology Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Vivian Loo
Affiliation:
McGill University Health Sciences Center, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
*
Respiratory Epidemiology Unit, McGill University, 1110 Pine Ave. West, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaH3A 1A3
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate the airborne viable bacterial concentrations generated during sputum induction and their reduction with exhaust ventilation, ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI), or both.

Methods:

Exhaust ventilation, upper air UVGI lights, and a portable UVGI unit were operated independently or in combination while and after sputum induction was performed for 58 patients suspected of having active tuberculosis. Viable airborne bacteria were sampled with volumetric air samplers, grown on blood agar, and identified with standard techniques.

Results:

During and immediately after sputum induction, concentrations of airborne bacteria, particularly respiratory tract or oropharyngeal organisms, increased rapidly, regardless of environmental conditions. The subsequent rate of reduction of airborne bacteria was most rapid with the portable UVGI unit, followed by upper air UVGI with air mixing. Exhaust ventilation achieved high air changes per hour, but efficacy in reducing airborne bacterial concentrations was low. However, the continuous entrainment of bacteria-laden air from the hallway outside may have resulted in underestimation. The efficacy of a wall-mounted upper air UVGI fixture was significantly less if there was no air mixing. The irradiation from this fixture was of adequate germicidal intensity only in a narrow horizontal plane 2.5 m above the floor.

Conclusion:

Sputum induction was associated with a rapid and substantial increase in airborne bacteria despite the use of exhaust ventilation providing more than 30 air changes per hour, and the adjunct use of UVGI. This emphasizes that health-care workers involved in similar cough-inducing procedures performed for patients with suspected tuberculosis must wear appropriate personal respirators (Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:483-489)

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 24 , Issue 7 , July 2003 , pp. 483 - 489
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in health-care facilities. MMWR 1994;43(RR13):1–132.Google Scholar
2.Health Canada. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of tuberculosis in Canadian health care facilities and other institutional settings. Can Commun Dis Rep 1996;22(suppl 1):1–50.Google Scholar
3.Wenger, PN, Often, J, Breeden, A, Orfas, D, Beck-Sague, CM, Jarvis, WR. Control of nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis among healthcare workers and HIV-infected patients. Lancet 1995;345:235–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Fella, P, Rivera, P, Hale, M, Squires, K, Sepkowitz, K. Dramatic decrease in tuberculin skin test conversion rate among employees at a hospital in New York City. Am J Infect Control 1995;23:352–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Maloney, SA, Pearson, ML, Gordon, MT, Del Castillo, R, Boyle, JF, Jarvis, WR. Efficacy of control measures in preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis to patients and health care workers. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:90–95.Google Scholar
6.Blumberg, HM, Watkins, DL, Jeffrey, PA-C, et al. Preventing the nosocomial transmission of tuberculosis. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:658–663.Google Scholar
7.Kellerman, S, Tokars, JI, Jarvis, WR. The cost of selected tuberculosis control measures at hospitals with a history of Mycobacterium tuberculosis outbreaks. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:542–547.Google Scholar
8.Riley, RL, Knight, M, Middlebrook, G. Ultraviolet susceptibility of beg and virulent tubercle bacilli. Am Rev Respir Dis 1976;113:413–418.Google Scholar
9.Collins, FM. Relative susceptibility of acid-fast and non–acid-fast bacteria to ultraviolet light. Appl Microbiol 1971;21:411–413.Google Scholar
10.Riley, RL, O'Grady, FO. Airborne Infection: Transmission and Control. New York: Macmillan; 1961.Google Scholar
11.Wells, WF, Wells, MW, Wilder, TS. The environmental control of epidemic contagion: an epidemiologic study of radiant disinfection of air in day schools. American Journal of Hygiene 1941;27:97–121.Google Scholar
12.Perkins, JE, Bahlke, AM, Silverman, HF. Effect of ultraviolet irradiation of classrooms on spread of measles in large rural central schools. Am J Public Health 1947;37:529–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Willmon, TL, Hollaender, A, Langmuir, AD. Studies of the control of respiratory diseases among naval recruits: a review of a four-year experience with ultraviolet irradiation and dust suppressive measures, 1943-1947. American Journal of Hygiene 1948;48:227–232.Google Scholar
14.Wells, WF. On air-borne infection: Study II. Droplets and droplet nuclei. American Journal of Hygiene 1934;20:611–618.Google Scholar
15.Menzies, RI, Fanning, A, Yuan, L. Tuberculosis among health care workers. N Engl J Med 1995;332:92–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.McKenna, MT, Hutton, M, Cauthen, G, Onorato, IM. The association between occupation and tuberculosis: a population-based survey. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:587–593.Google Scholar
17.Menzies, RI, Fanning, A, Yuan, L, Fitzgerald, JM. Hospital ventilation and risk of tuberculous infection in Canadian health care workers. Ann Intern Med 2000;133:779–789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Malasky, C, Jordan, T, Potulski, F, Reichman, LB. Occupational tuberculosis infections among pulmonary physicians in training. American Review of Respiratory Disease 1990;142:505–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Anderson, C, Inhaber, N, Menzies, RI. Comparison of sputum induction with fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:1570–1574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Menzies, RI, Schwartzman, K, Loo, V, Pasztor, J. Measuring ventilation of patient care areas in hospitals: description of a new protocol. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:1992–1999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Murray, PR, Baron, EJ, Pfaller, MA, Tenover, FL, Yolken, RH, eds. Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 7th ed. New York: Williams and Wilkins; 1999.Google Scholar
22.Dawson-Saunders, B, Trapp, RG. Basic and Clinical Biostatistics. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange; 1990.Google Scholar
23.Fennelly, KP, Nardell, EA. The relative efficacy of respirators and room ventilation in preventing occupational tuberculosis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:754–759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Nardell, EA. Interrupting transmission from patients with unsuspected tuberculosis: a unique role for upper-room ultraviolet air disinfection. Am J Infect Control 1995;23:156–164.Google Scholar
25.Riley, RL, Permutt, S, Kaufman, JE. Convention, air mixing and ultraviolet air disinfection in rooms. Arch Environ Health 1971;22:200–207.Google Scholar
26.Nicas, M, Miller, SL. A multi-zone model evaluation of the efficacy of upper-room air ultraviolet germicidal irradiation. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 1999;14:317–328.Google Scholar
27.Riley, RL, Wells, WF, Mills, CC, Nyka, W, McLean, RL. Air hygiene in tuberculosis: quantitative studies of infectivity and control in a pilot ward. American Review of Tuberculosis and Pulmonary Diseases 1957;75:420–431.Google Scholar
28.Riley, RL, Kaufman, JE. Effect of relative humidity on the inactivation of airborne Serratia marcescens by ultraviolet radiation. Appl Microbiol 1972;23:1113–1120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed