Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:21:45.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of a Comprehensive Program to Reduce Needlestick Injuries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Abdul B. Zafar ,
R. Christopher Butler ,
Judith M. Podgorny ,
Patricia A. Mennonna ,
Larry A. Gaydos  and
John A. Sandiford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Arlington Hospital Needlestick Injury (NSI) Prevention Program was created to protect healthcare workers from NSI and to assess the effectiveness of our interventions. Interventions included revising NSI policy and procedures. The average NSI rate dropped from 109 to 43 per year after the interventions, over a period of 4 years.

Type
Concise Communications
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 18 , Issue 10 , October 1997 , pp. 712 - 715
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. APIC position paper: Prevention of device-mediated bloodborne infections to health care workers. Am J Infect Control 1993;21:76–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. English, JF. Reported hospital needlestick injuries in relation to knowledge/skill, design, and management problems. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:259–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Wenk, RE, Dutta, D, Mellema, S, Sidlak, M. Needle Accidents and Disease Transmission. Special Topics No. ST 88-4 (ST-163). Chicago, IL: The American Society of Clinical Pathologists; 1988:26.Google Scholar
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Update- transmission of HIV infection during invasive dental procedures—Florida. MMWR 1991;40:21-27,33.Google Scholar
5. Curry, J. New devices claim to reduce injuries from needlesticks. OR Manager 1993;9:1,12–14.Google ScholarPubMed
6. Seto, WH, Ching, TY, Chu, YB, Fielding, F. Brief report: reduction of the frequency of needle recapping by effective education: a need for conceptual alteration. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1990;11:194–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Haiduven, DJ, De Mars, TM, Stevens, MA. A five-year study of needlestick injuries: significant reduction associated with communication, education, and convenient placement of sharps containers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:265–271.Google Scholar
8. Gerberding, JL. Needlestick prevention: new paradigms for research. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:257–258.Google Scholar
9. Horning, LA, Smith, PW. Infection control violations. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:672–675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. DeFilippo, VC, Bowen, RW, Ingbar, DH. A Universal Precautions monitoring system adaptable to any health care department. Am J Infect Control 1992;20:159–163.Google Scholar
11. In-room sharps disposal systems reducing needlesticks. Hosp Infect Control 1988;15:85–88.Google Scholar
12. Emergency Care Research Institute. Needlestick-prevention device for IV therapy and IM and subcutaneous medication administration. Health Devices 1994;23:316–369.Google Scholar
13. Smith, DA, Eisenstein, HC, Esrig, C, Godbold, J. Constant incidence rates of needle-stick injury paradoxically suggest modest preventive effect of sharps disposal system. J Occup Med 1992;34:546–551.Google ScholarPubMed
14. Linnemann, CC Jr, Cannon, C, De Ronde, M, Lanphear, B. Effect of educational programs, rigid sharps containers, and Universal Precautions on reported needlestick injuries in health care workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991;12:214–219.Google Scholar