Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:12:35.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Decontamination and Sterilization Protocol Employed During Reuse of Cardiac Electrophysiology Catheters Inactivates Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Julian D. Druce
Affiliation:
Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, North Melbourne
Jessica S. Russell
Affiliation:
Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, North Melbourne
Christopher J. Birch
Affiliation:
Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, North Melbourne
Lynette A. Yates
Affiliation:
Centre for Heart & Chest Research, Department of Medicine, Monash University and Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Richard W. Harper
Affiliation:
Centre for Heart & Chest Research, Department of Medicine, Monash University and Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Joseph J. Smolich*
Affiliation:
Centre for Heart & Chest Research, Department of Medicine, Monash University and Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
*
Centre for Heart and Chest Research, Cardiology Unit, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, 3168, Victoria, Australia

Abstract

Objective:

To assess the effect of a standard decontamination and sterilization protocol employed during reuse of cardiac electrophysiology (EP) catheters on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

Setting:

Public health viral research laboratory.

Methods:

Studies were performed on distal, electrode-containing segments of 40 EP catheters previously used in up to 10 clinical EP procedures. EP catheter segments were immersed for 1 hour in blood contaminated with a high titer of HIV. After air drying for 2 hours, subgroups of 8 EP catheters were subjected to either (1) no treatment, (2) washing in general purpose detergent, (3) washing in enzyme cleaner, (4) sterilization in ethylene oxide, or (5) the full protocol of sequential detergent-enzyme cleaner-ethylene oxide exposure. HIV infectivity after treatment was determined by measuring HIV RNA and, in cell culture studies, assessing HIV-induced cytopathic effects (CPEs) and supernatant HIV-specific p24 antigen content.

Results:

With no treatment, all catheters had high HIV RNA levels associated with CPEs and high p24 antigen levels. After washing in detergent, 5 of 8 catheters had HIV RNA detected, but without CPEs or p24 antigen. HIV RNA was detected in all catheters after washing in enzyme cleaner, with CPEs and a high p24 antigen level in 1 of 8 catheters. HIV RNA, CPEs, and p24 antigen were absent after ethylene oxide. After the full protocol, HIV RNA levels were undetectable (n = 7) or low (n = 1), without evidence of CPEs or p24 antigen.

Conclusion:

Appropriate decontamination and sterilization of EP catheters during reuse is highly effective in inactivating HIV.

Type
Orginal Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.O'Donoghue, S, Piatta, EV. Reuse of pacing catheters: a survey of safety and efficacy. Pacing Clin Electropkysiol 1988;11:12791280.Google Scholar
2.Blomstrom-Lundqvist, C. The safety of reusing ablation catheters with temperature control and the need for a validation protocol and guidelines for reprocessing. Pacing Clin Electropkysiol 1998;21:25632570.Google Scholar
3.Dunnigan, A, Roberts, C, McNamara, M, Benson, DW Jr, Benditi, DG. Success of re-use of cardiac electrode catheters. Am J Cardiol 1987;60:807810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Avitall, B, Khan, M, Krum, D, Jazayeri, M, Hare, J. Repeated use of ablation catheters: a prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:13671372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Karon, JM, Fleming, PL, Steketee, RW, De Cock, KM. HIV in the United States at the turn of the century: an epidemic in transition. Am J Public Health 2001;91:10601068.Google Scholar
6.Chant, K, Lowe, D, Rubin, G, et al.Patient-to-patient transmission of HIV in private surgical consulting rooms. Lancet 1993;342:15481549.Google Scholar
7.Ciesielski, CA, Marianos, DW, Schochetman, G, Witte, JJ, Jaffe, HW. The 1990 Florida dental investigation: the press and the science. Ann Intern Med 1994;121:886888.Google Scholar
8.Lewis, W. Cardiomyopathy in AIDS: a pathophysiological perspective. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2000;43:151170.Google Scholar
9.Barbaro, G, Di Lorenzo, G, Grisorio, B, Barbarini, G. Clinical meaning of ventricular ectopic beats in the diagnosis of HIV-related myocarditis: a retrospective analysis of Holter electrocardiographic recordings, echocardiographic parameters, histopathological and virologie findings. Cardiologia 1996;41:11991207.Google Scholar
10.Barbaro, G, Fisher, SD, Pellicelli, AM, Lipshultz, SE. The expanding role of the cardiologist in the care of HIV infected patients. Heart 2001;86:365367.Google Scholar
11.Rerkpattanapipat, P, Wongpraparut, N, Jacobs, LE, Kotler, MN. Cardiac manifestations of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:602608.Google Scholar
12.Druce, JD, Jardine, D, Locarnini, SA, Birch, CJ. Susceptibility of HIV to inactivation by disinfectants and ultraviolet light. J Hosp Infect 1995;30:167180.Google Scholar
13.Pantaleo, G, Graziosi, C, Butini, L, et al.Lymphoid organs function as major reservoirs for human immunodeficiency virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991;88:98389842.Google Scholar
14.Pantaleo, G, Graziosi, C, Fauci, AS. The role of lymphoid organs in the pathogenesis of HIV infection. Semin Immunol 1993;5:157163.Google Scholar
15.Druce, JD. Human immunodeficiency virus: disinfection and control. In: Block, SS, ed. Disinfection, Sterilization, and Preservation, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001:573584.Google Scholar
16.Galio, D. Uses of immunofluorescence in diagnostic virology. American Journal of Medical Technology 1983;49:157162.Google Scholar
17.Calkins, H, Prystowsky, E, Carlson, M, Klein, LS, Saul, JP, Gillette, P. Temperature monitoring during radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures using closed loop control. Circulation 1994;90:12791286.Google Scholar
18.Evengard, B, Ehrnst, A, von Sydow, M, Pehrson, PO, Lundbergh, P, Linder, E. Effect of heat on extracted HIV viral infectivity and antibody activity using the filter paper technique of blood sampling. AIDS 1989;3:591595.Google Scholar
19.Russell, AD. The principles of antimicrobial activity and resistance: disinfection and control. In: Block, SS, ed. Disinfection, Sterilization, and Preservation, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001:3155.Google Scholar
20.Grabsch, EA, Grayson, ML, Johnson, PDR, Yates, LA, Harper, RW, Smolich, JJ. Bactericidal efficacy of sterilizing protocol for re-used cardiac electrophysiology catheters. Am J Cardiol 2002;89:770772.Google Scholar