Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T19:36:36.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Current Approach to Latent Tuberculosis Diagnosis and Treatment among Medical Center Occupational Health Physicians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Christopher Vinnard ,
Darren Linkin  and
Amy Behrman
Christopher Vinnard*
Affiliation:
Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Darren Linkin
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Amy Behrman
Affiliation:
Division of Occupational Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
*
Division of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, 245 North 15th Street, MS 461, New College Building 6314, Philadelphia, PA 19102 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We surveyed physicians in a national occupational medicine society regarding diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in healthcare workers. Most respondents used a combination of skin testing and interferon gamma release assays. Respondents integrating interferon gamma release assays into screening placed greater importance on employee acceptability and convenience.

Type
Concise Communication
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 33 , Issue 12 , December 2012 , pp. 1262 - 1265
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Dooley, SW JrCastro, KG, Hutton, MD, Mullan, RJ, Polder, JA, Snider, DE JrGuidelines for preventing the transmission of tuberculosis in health-care facilities, with special focus on HIV-related issues. MMWR Recomm Rep 1990;39(RR-17):1–29.Google Scholar
2.Bangsberg, DR, Crowley, K, Moss, A, Dobkin, JF, McGregor, C, Neu, HC. Reduction in tuberculin skin-test conversions among medical house staff associated with improved tuberculosis infection control practices. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:566–570.Google Scholar
3.Jensen, PA, Lambert, LA, Iademarco, MF, Ridzon, R. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in healthcare settings, 2005. MMWR Recomm Rep 2005;54(RR-17):1–141.Google Scholar
4.Jasmer, RM, Nahid, P, Hopewell, PC. Clinical practice. Latent tuberculosis infection. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1860–1866.Google Scholar
5.Joseph, HA, Shrestha-Kuwahara, R, Lowry, D, et al.Factors influencing health care workers' adherence to work site tuberculosis screening and treatment policies. Am J Infect Control 2004;32:456–461.Google Scholar
6.Salazar-Schicchi, J, Jedlovsky, V, Ajayi, A, Colson, PW, Hirsch-Moverman, Y, El-Sadr, W. Physician attitudes regarding bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccination and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2004;8:1443–1447.Google Scholar
7.Sahni, R, Miranda, C, Yen-Lieberman, B, et al.Does the implementation of an interferon-gamma release assay in lieu of a tuberculin skin test increase acceptance of preventive therapy for latent tuberculosis among healthcare workers? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:197–199.Google Scholar
8.Mancuso, JD, Mazurek, GH, Tribble, D, et al.Discordance among commercially available diagnostics for latent tuberculosis infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012;185:427–434.Google Scholar
9.Sinkowitz, RL, Fridkin, SK, Manangan, L, Wenger, PN, Jarvis, WR. Status of tuberculosis infection control programs at United States hospitals, 1989 to 1992. APIC. Am J Infect Control 1996;24:226–234.Google Scholar
10.Villarino, ME, Mazurek, G. Tuberculosis contacts, concerns, and controls: what matters for healthcare workers? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:433–435.Google Scholar