Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:00:53.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contribution of Prior, Multiple-, and Repetitive Surgeries to the Risk of Surgical Site Infections in the Netherlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2017

Janneke D. M. Verberk ,
Anouk P. Meijs ,
Margreet C. Vos ,
Liesbeth M. A. Schreurs ,
Suzanne E. Geerlings ,
Sabine C. de Greeff  and
Mayke B. G. Koek
Janneke D. M. Verberk*
Affiliation:
Department Epidemiology and Surveillance, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
Anouk P. Meijs
Affiliation:
Department Epidemiology and Surveillance, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
Margreet C. Vos
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Liesbeth M. A. Schreurs
Affiliation:
Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Department of Surgery, Almelo, the Netherlands
Suzanne E. Geerlings
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Sabine C. de Greeff
Affiliation:
Department Epidemiology and Surveillance, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
Mayke B. G. Koek*
Affiliation:
Department Epidemiology and Surveillance, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands
*
Address correspondence to Janneke D. M. Verberk, MSc, Room U3.46, Postbus 1 (postbak 75), 3720 BA Bilthoven, the Netherlands, ([email protected]) or Mayke BG Koek, MD, Phd, MSc, Room U2.30, Postbus 1 (postbak 75), 3720 BA Bilthoven, the Netherlands ([email protected]).
Address correspondence to Janneke D. M. Verberk, MSc, Room U3.46, Postbus 1 (postbak 75), 3720 BA Bilthoven, the Netherlands, ([email protected]) or Mayke BG Koek, MD, Phd, MSc, Room U2.30, Postbus 1 (postbak 75), 3720 BA Bilthoven, the Netherlands ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Surveillance is an important strategy to reduce the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs). We investigated whether prior, multiple-, or repetitive surgeries are risk factors for SSI and whether they should be preserved in the protocol of the Dutch national SSI surveillance network.

METHODS

Dutch national SSI surveillance data 2012–2015 were selected, including 34 commonly performed procedures from 8 major surgical specialties. Definitions of SSIs followed international standardized criteria. We used multivariable multilevel logistic regression techniques to evaluate whether prior, multiple-, or repetitive procedure(s) are risk factors for SSIs. We considered surgeries clustered within partnerships of medical specialists and within hospitals (random effects) and different baseline risks between surgical specialties (fixed effects). Several patient and surgical characteristics were considered possible confounders and were included where necessary. We performed analyses for superficial and deep SSIs combined as well as separately.

RESULTS

In total, 115,943 surgeries were reported by 85 hospitals; among them, 2,960 (2.6%) resulted in SSIs (49.3% deep SSIs). The odds ratio (OR) for having prior surgery was 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74–1.20); the OR for repetitive surgery was 2.39 (95% CI, 2.06–2.77); and the OR for multiple surgeries was1.27 (95% CI, 1.07–1.51). The latter effect was mainly caused by prolonged duration of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple- and repetitive surgeries significantly increased the risk of an SSI, whereas prior surgery did not. Therefore, prior surgery is not an essential data item to include in the national SSI surveillance network. The increased risk of SSIs for multiple surgeries was mainly caused by prolonged duration of surgery, therefore, it may be sufficient to report only duration of surgery to the surveillance network, instead of both (the variables duration of surgery and multiple surgeries).

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1298–1305

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 38 , Issue 11 , November 2017 , pp. 1298 - 1305
Copyright
© 2017 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. van der Kooi, TI, Mannien, J, Wille, JC, van Benthem, BH. Prevalence of nosocomial infections in the Netherlands, 2007–2008: results of the first four national studies. J Hosp Infect 2010;75:168–172.Google Scholar
2. PREventie van ZIekenhuisinfecties door Surveillance (PREZIES-RIVM). Referentiecijfers 2012/2013: Postoperatieve. Wondinfecties Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu website. http://www.rivm.nl/Onderwerpen/P/PREZIES/Incidentieonderzoek_POWI/Referentiecijfers_POWI. Accessed February 12, 2015.Google Scholar
3. Hubner, M, Diana, M, Zanetti, G, Eisenring, MC, Demartines, N, Troillet, N. Surgical site infections in colon surgery: the patient, the procedure, the hospital, and the surgeon. Arch Surg 2011;146:1240–1245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Smith, RL, Bohl, JK, McElearney, ST, et al. Wound infection after elective colorectal resection. Ann Surg 2004;239:599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Blumetti, J, Luu, M, Sarosi, G, et al. Surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: do risk factors vary depending on the type of infection considered? Surgery 2007;142:704–711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Konishi, T, Watanabe, T, Kishimoto, J, Nagawa, H. Elective colon and rectal surgery differ in risk factors for wound infection: results of prospective surveillance. Ann Surg 2006;244:758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Cheadle, WG. Risk factors for surgical site infection. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2006;7(Suppl 1):S7–S11.Google Scholar
8. Biondo, S. Prevention of surgical site infection: still an important challenge in colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 2014;18:861–862.Google Scholar
9. Owens, CD, Stoessel, K. Surgical site infections: epidemiology, microbiology and prevention. J Hosp Infect 2008;70(Suppl 2):S3–S10.Google Scholar
10. Kirkland, KB, Briggs, JP, Trivette, SL, Wilkinson, WE, Sexton, DJ. The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:725–730.Google Scholar
11. Whitehouse, JD, Friedman, ND, Kirkland, KB, Richardson, WJ, Sexton, DJ. The impact of surgical-site infections following orthopedic surgery at a community hospital and a university hospital: adverse quality of life, excess length of stay, and extra cost. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:183–189.Google Scholar
12. Anderson, DJ. Surgical site infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2011;25:135–153.Google Scholar
13. Florman, S, Nichols, RL. Current approaches for the prevention of surgical site infections. Am J Infect Dis 2007;3:51.Google Scholar
14. Mangram, AJ, Horan, TC, Pearson, ML, Silver, LC, Jarvis, WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:250–278; quiz 279–280.Google Scholar
15. Prevention of hospital-acquired infections—a practical guide. World Health Organization website. http://www.who.int/emc. Published 2002. Accessed March 19, 2015.Google Scholar
16. Mabit, C, Marcheix, PS, Mounier, M, et al. Impact of a surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance program in orthopedics and traumatology. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012;98:690–695.Google Scholar
17. Geubbels, EL, Nagelkerke, NJ, Mintjes-De Groot, AJ, Vandenbroucke-Grauls, CM, Grobbee, DE, De Boer, AS. Reduced risk of surgical site infections through surveillance in a network. Int J Qual Health Care 2006;18:127–133.Google Scholar
18. PREventie van ZIekenhuisinfecties door Surveillance (PREZIES-RIVM). Protocol en dataspecificaties. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu website. http://www.rivm.nl/Onderwerpen/P/PREZIES/Incidentieonderzoek_POWI/Protocol_module_Postoperatieve_wondinfecties/Protocollen_Postoperatieve_Wondinfecties_archief. Published January 2015. Accessed February 12, 2015.Google Scholar
19. van Dishoeck, AM, Koek, MB, Steyerberg, EW, van Benthem, BH, Vos, MC, Lingsma, HF. Use of surgical-site infection rates to rank hospital performance across several types of surgery. Br J Surg 2013;100:628–636; discussion 637.Google Scholar
20. Koek, MB, Wille, JC, Isken, MR, Voss, A, van Benthem, BH. Post-discharge surveillance (PDS) for surgical site infections: a good method is more important than a long duration. Euro Surveill 2015;20:pii:21042.Google Scholar
21. Perencevich, EN, Sands, KE, Cosgrove, SE, Guadagnoli, E, Meara, E, Platt, R. Health and economic impact of surgical site infections diagnosed after hospital discharge. Emerg Infect Dis 2003;9:196–203.Google Scholar
22. PREventie van ZIekenhuisinfecties door Surveillance (PREZIES-RIVM). Surveillance Na Ontslag (SNO). Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu website. http://www.rivm.nl/Onderwerpen/P/PREZIES/Incidentieonderzoek_POWI/Surveillance_na_ontslag_SNO. Accessed February 20, 2015.Google Scholar
23. Sands, K, Vineyard, G, Platt, R. Surgical site infections occurring after hospital discharge. J Infect Dis 1996;173:963–970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. de Haas, R, Mintjes-de Groot, AJ, Geubbels, ELPE, van den Berg, JMJ, de Boer, AS. Rapport Inventarisatie van surveillance na ontslag in het PREZIES-project. Bilthoven: Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu en Centraal begeleidingsorgaan voor de Intercollegiale Toetsing;1998. 212200005.Google Scholar
25. Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, Martone, WJ, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:606–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Werkgroep Infectie Preventie (WIP). Registration of hospital infections. Leiden: Leiden University Medical Center; 2001.Google Scholar
27. Surveillance of surgical site infections in European hospitals—HAISSI protocol. Version 1.02. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control website. http://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/120215_TED_SSI_protocol.pdf. Published 2012. Accessed March 11, 2015.Google Scholar
28. Mannien, J, van der Zeeuw, AE, Wille, JC, van den Hof, S. Validation of surgical site infection surveillance in the Netherlands. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:36–41.Google Scholar
29. Biondo, S, Kreisler, E, Fraccalvieri, D, Basany, EE, Codina-Cazador, A, Ortiz, H. Risk factors for surgical site infection after elective resection for rectal cancer. A multivariate analysis on 2131 patients. Colorectal Dis 2012;14:e95–e102.Google Scholar
30. Tang, R, Chen, HH, Wang, YL, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection after elective resection of the colon and rectum: a single-center prospective study of 2,809 consecutive patients. Ann. Surg 2001;234:181–189.Google Scholar
31. Surgical Site Infection Surveillance Service (SSISS-HPA). Protocol for the Surveillance of Surgical Site Infection. Public Health England website. https://www.gov.uk/surgical-site-infection-surveillance-service-ssiss. Published June 2013. Accessed May 12, 2015.Google Scholar
32. Pessaux, P, Msika, S, Atalla, D, Hay, JM, Flamant, Y. Risk factors for postoperative infectious complications in noncolorectal abdominal surgery: a multivariate analysis based on a prospective multicenter study of 4718 patients. Arch Surg 2003;138:314–324.Google Scholar
33. Wloch, C, Wilson, J, Lamagni, T, Harrington, P, Charlett, A, Sheridan, E. Risk factors for surgical site infection following caesarean section in England: results from a multicentre cohort study. BJOG 2012;119:1324–1333.Google Scholar
34. Killian, CA, Graffunder, EM, Vinciguerra, TJ, Venezia, RA. Risk factors for surgical-site infections following cesarean section. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:613–617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35. Segal, CG, Waller, DK, Tilley, B, Piller, L, Bilimoria, K. An evaluation of differences in risk factors for individual types of surgical site infections after colon surgery. Surgery 2014;156:1253–1260.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Verberk et al supplementary material

Table S1

Download Verberk et al supplementary material(File)
File 57 KB