Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:24:32.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Between Community and Hospital: Healthcare-Associated Gram-Negative Bacteremia among Hospitalized Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Jonas Marschall*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
Victoria J. Fraser
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
Joshua Doherty
Affiliation:
Medical Informatics, BIC Healthcare, St Louis, Missouri
David K. Warren
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
*
Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, St Louis 63110, MO ([email protected])

Abstract

Objective.

Healthcare-associated, community-acquired bacteremia is a subcategory of community-acquired bacteremia distinguished by recent exposure of the patient to the healthcare system before hospital admission. Our objective was to apply this category to a prospective cohort of hospitalized patients with gram-negative bacteremia to determine differences in the epidemiological characteristics, treatment, and outcome of community-acquired bacteremia; healthcare-associated, community-acquired bacteremia; and hospital-acquired bacteremia.

Design.

A 6-month prospective cohort study.

Setting.

A 1,250-bed tertiary care hospital.

Patients.

Adults hospitalized with gram-negative bacteremia.

Results.

Among 250 patients, 160 (64.0%) had bacteremia within 48 hours after admission; 132 (82.5%) of these were considered to have healthcare-associated, community-acquired bacteremia, according to previously published criteria. For patients with healthcare-associated, community-acquired bacteremia, compared with patients with community-acquired bacteremia, malignancies (59 [44.7%] of 132 patients vs 3 [10.7%] of 28 patients; P = .001), open wounds at admission (42 [31.8%] vs 3 [10.7%]; P = .02), and intravascular catheter-related infections (26 [19.7%] vs 0; P = .009) were more frequent and Escherichia coli as a causative agent was less frequent (16 [57.1%] vs 33 [25.0%]; P = .001). There was no difference between these 2 groups in inadequate empirical antibiotic treatment (36 [27.3%] vs 6 [21.4%]; P = .5) and hospital mortality (18 [13.6%] vs 2 [[7.1%]; P = .5). Compared with 90 patients with hospital-acquired bacteremia, patients with healthcare-associated, community-acquired bacteremia had a higher Charlson score (odds ratio [OR], 1.31 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14–1.49]) but were less likely to have lymphoma (OR, 0.07 [95% CI, 0.01–0.51]), neutropenia (OR, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.07–0.61]), a removable foreign body (OR, 0.08 [95% CI, 0.03–0.20]), or Klebsiella pneumoniae infection (OR, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.11–0.62]).

Conclusions.

Many cases of gram-negative bacteremia that occurred in hospitalized patients were healthcare associated. The patients differed in some aspects from patients with community-acquired bacteremia and from those with hospital-acquired bacteremia, but not in mortality.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Pittet, D. Infection control and quality health care in the new millennium. Am J Infect Control 2005;33:258267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Wunderink, RG. Healthcare-associated bacteremia: stirring the mud. Crit Care Med 2006;34:26852686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Diekema, DJ, Beekmann, SE, Chapin, KC, Morel, KA, Munson, E, Doern, GV. Epidemiology and outcome of nosocomial and community-onset bloodstream infection. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:36553660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Garner, JS, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, Horan, TC, Hughes, JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Siegman-Igra, Y, Fourer, B, Orni-Wasserlauf, R, et al.Reappraisal of community-acquired bacteremia: a proposal of a new classification for the spectrum of acquisition of bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2002;34:14311439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Friedman, ND, Kaye, KS, Stout, JE, et al.Healthcare-associated bloodstream infections in adults: a reason to change the accepted definition of community-acquired infections. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:791797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Lesens, O, Hansmann, Y, Brannigan, E, et al.Healthcare-associated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and the risk for methicillin resistance: is the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definition for community-acquired bacteremia still appropriate? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2005;26:204209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Shorr, AF, Tabak, YP, Killian, AD, Gupta, V, Liu, LZ, Kollef, MH. Healthcare-associated bloodstream infection: a distinct entity? Insights from a large U.S. database. Crit Care Med 2006;34:25882595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Sun, HY, Chen, SY, Chang, SC, Pan, SC, Su, CP, Chen, YC. Community-onset Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia: influence of health care exposure on antimicrobial susceptibility. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2006;55:135141.Google Scholar
10.Liao, CH, Chen, SY, Chang, SC, Hsueh, PR, Hung, CC, Chen, YC. Characteristics of community-acquired and health care-associated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in patients treated at the emergency department of a teaching hospital. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2005;53:8592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Lescure, FX, Locher, G, Eveillard, M, et al.Community-acquired infection with healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: the role of home nursing care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:12131218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Karas, JA, Enoch, DA, Emery, MM. Community-onset healthcare-associated MRSA bacteraemia in a district general hospital. J Hosp Infect 2006;62:480486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Charlson, ME, Pompei, P, Ales, KL, MacKenzie, CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.McCabe, WR, Jackson, GG. Gram-negative bacteremia. Arch Intern Med 1962;110:847855.Google Scholar
15.Bone, RC, Balk, RA, Cerra, FB, et al.Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest 1992;101:16441655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Scarsi, KK, Feinglass, JM, Scheetz, MH, Postelnick, MJ, Bolon, MK, Noskin, GA. Impact of inactive empiric antimicrobial therapy on inpatient mortality and length of stay. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006;50:33553360.Google Scholar
17.Lockhart, SR, Abramson, MA, Beekmann, SE, et al.Antimicrobial resistance among gram-negative bacilli causing infections in intensive care unit patients in the United States between 1993 and 2004. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:33523359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.McDonald, JR, Friedman, ND, Stout, JE, Sexton, DJ, Kaye, KS. Risk factors for ineffective therapy in patients with bloodstream infection. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:308313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Ibrahim, EH, Sherman, G, Ward, S, Fraser, VJ, Kollef, MH. The influence of inadequate antimicrobial treatment of bloodstream infections on patient outcomes in the ICU setting. Chest 2000;118:146155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Leibovici, L, Shraga, I, Drucker, M, Konigsberger, H, Samra, Z, Pitlik, SD. The benefit of appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment in patients with bloodstream infection. J Intern Med 1998;244:379386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed