Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:11:53.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Active Surveillance for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Vanessa Sarda ,
Anne Molloy ,
Shirahi Kadkol ,
William M. Janda ,
Ronald Hershow  and
Marcella McGuinn
Vanessa Sarda*
Affiliation:
Section of Infectious Disease, University of Illinois Medical Center, Chicago, IL
Anne Molloy
Affiliation:
Infection Control Department, University of Illinois Medical Center, Chicago, IL
Shirahi Kadkol
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Medical Center, Chicago, IL
William M. Janda
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Medical Center, Chicago, IL
Ronald Hershow
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, University of Illinois Medical Center, Chicago, IL
Marcella McGuinn
Affiliation:
Section of Infectious Disease, University of Illinois Medical Center, Chicago, IL
*
Section of Infectious Disease, University of Illinois Medical Center, Chicago, IL ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background.

We describe our experience using a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) during a period of active surveillance in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from March 2007 until November 2007.

Objective.

TO compare PCR with bacterial culture methods and find the screening algorithm that most successfully ensures appropriate isolation of colonized patients.

Methods.

Patients in the NICU were screened for MRSA on admission and weekly thereafter until discharge. Healthcare workers (HCWs) were also screened as part of an outbreak investigation. A total of 599 individuals were screened for MRSA with both a PCR assay and selective bacterial culture. Strain typing was performed on all MRSA isolates to determine clonal relatedness.

Results.

Twenty-one of 435 infants (4.8%) screened positive for MRSA with the PCR assay. Only 11 patients (52.4%) had concomitant bacterial cultures positive for MRSA. Compared to bacterial culture, the PCR assay had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 97.6%, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 52.4%. Infants that tested positive for MRSA by both culture and PCR were more likely to have a positive PCR assay result when retested than were those who tested positive by PCR alone (80% vs 20%; P = .02). Strain typing of MRSA isolates identified a common clone in only 2 colonized infants.

Conclusion.

Our data show that, in our neonatal population, the reproducibility of PCR assay results for culture-negative patients was low compared with the reproducibility of results for culture-positive Patients. Furthermore, the low PPV suggests that for nearly half of individuals who were PCR-positive, the result was falsely positive, which argues against the use of PCR assays alone for MRSA screening in the NICU.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 30 , Issue 9 , September 2009 , pp. 854 - 860
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.NNIS System. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control 2004;32:470–85.Google Scholar
2.Lucet, JC, Paoletti, X, Lolom, I, et al.Successful long-term program for controlling methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 2005;31:1051–1057.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Jernigan, JA, Titus, MG, Groschel, DH, Getchell-White, S, Farr, BM. Effectiveness of contact isolation during a hospital outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Am J Epidemiol 1996;143:496–504.Google Scholar
4.Selkon, JB, Stokes, ER, Ingham, HR. The role of an isolation unit in the control of hospital infection with methicillin-resistant staphylococci. J Hosp Infect 1980;1:41–46.Google Scholar
5.Huang, SS, Yokoe, DS, Hinrichsen, VL, et al.Impact of routine intensive care unit surveillance cultures and resultant barrier precautions on hospital-wide methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2006;43:971–978.Google Scholar
6.Safdar, N, Marx, J, Meyer, NA, Maki, DG. Effectiveness of preemptive barrier precautions in controlling nosocomial colonization and infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a burn unit. Am J Infect Control 2006;34:476–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Clancy, M, Graepler, A, Wilson, M, Douglas, I, Johnson, J, Price, CS. Active screening in high-risk units is an effective and cost-avoidant method to reduce the rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in the hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:1009–1017.Google Scholar
8.Nijssen, S, Bonten, MJ, Weinstein, RA. Are active microbiological surveillance and subsequent isolation needed to prevent the spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus? Clin Infect Dis 2005;40:405–409.Google Scholar
9.Saint, S, Higgins, LA, Nallamothu, BK, Chenoweth, C. Do physicians examine patients in contact isolation less frequently? A brief report. Am J Infect Control 2003;31:354–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Stelfox, HT, Bates, DW, Redelmeier, DA. Safety of patients isolated for infection control. JAMA 2003;290:1899–1905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Fleer, A, Gerards, LJ, Verhoef, J. Host defence to bacterial infection in the neonate. J Hosp Infect 1988;11(Suppl A):320–327.Google Scholar
12.Rajan, L, Smyth, E, Humphreys, H. Screening for MRSA in ICU patients: how does PCR compare with culture? J Infect 2007;55:353–357.Google Scholar
13.Diederen, B, van Duijn, I, van Belkum, A, Willemse, P, van Keulen, P, Kluytmans, J. Performance of CHROMagar MRSA medium for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43:1925–1927.Google Scholar
14.Farley, JE, Stamper, PD, Ross, T, Cai, M, Speser, S, Carroll, KC. Comparison of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR assay to culture by use of BBL CHROMagar MRSA for detection of MRSA in nasal surveillance cultures from an at-risk community population. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:743–746.Google Scholar
15.van Hal, SJ, Stark, D, Lockwood, B, Marriott, D, Harkness, J. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) detection: comparison of two molecular methods (IDI-MRSA PCR assay and GenoType MRSA Direct PCR assay) with three selective MRSA agars (MRSA ID, MRSASelect, and CHROMagar MRSA) for use with infection-control swabs. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:2486–2490.Google Scholar
16.Warren, DK, Liao, RS, Merz, LR, Eveland, M, Dunne, WM Jr.Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from nasal swab specimens by a real-time PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:5578–5581.Google Scholar
17.Desjardins, M, Guibord, C, Lalonde, B, Toye, B, Ramotar, K. Evaluation of the IDI-MRSA assay for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from nasal and rectal specimens pooled in a selective broth. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44:1219–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Hägen, RM, Seegmuller, I, Navai, J, Kappstein, I, Lehn, N, Miethke, T. Development of a real-time PCR assay for rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from clinical samples. Int J Med Microbiol 2005;295:77–86.Google Scholar
19.Oberdorfer, K, Pohl, S, Frey, M, Heeg, K, Wendt, C. Evaluation of a single-locus real-time polymerase chain reaction as a screening test for specific detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in ICU patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2006;25:657–663.Google Scholar
20.Cunningham, R, Jenks, P, Northwood, J, Wallis, M, Ferguson, S, Hunt, S. Effect on MRSA transmission of rapid PCR testing of patients admitted to critical care. J Hosp Infect 2007;65:24–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Boyce, JM, Havill, NL. Comparison of BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR versus the CHROMagar MRSA assay for screening patients for the presence of MRSA strains. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:350–351.Google Scholar
22.Rossney, AS, Herra, CM, Fitzgibbon, MM, Morgan, PM, Lawrence, MJ, O'Connell, B. Evaluation of the IDI-MRSA assay on the SmartCycler real-time PCR platform for rapid detection of MRSA from screening specimens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2007;26:459—466.Google Scholar
23.Paule, SM, Hacek, DM, Kufher, B, et al.Performance of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus test before and during high-volume clinical use. J Clin Microbiol 2007;45:2993–2998.Google Scholar
24.Mausner, JS, Bahn, AK. Epidemiology: An Introductory Text. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1974.Google Scholar
25.Weber, SG, Huang, SS, Oriola, S, et al.Legislative mandates for use of active surveillance cultures to screen for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci: position statement from the Joint SHEA and APIC Task Force. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:249–260.Google Scholar
26.Espy, MJ, Uhi, JR, Sloan, LM, et al.Real-time PCR in clinical microbiology: applications for routine laboratory testing. Clin Microbiol Rev 2006;19:165–256.Google Scholar
27.Harbarth, S, Fankhauser, C, Schrenzel, J, et al.Universal screening for methicilhn-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at hospital admission and nosocomial infection in surgical patients. JAMA 2008;299:1149–1157.Google Scholar
28.Harbarth, S, Masuet-Aumatell, C, Schrenzel, J, et al.Evaluation of rapid screening and pre-emptive contact isolation for detecting and controlling methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in critical care: an interventional cohort study. Crit Care 2006;10:R25.Google Scholar
29.Conterno, LO, Shymanski, J, Ramotar, K, et al.Real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: impact on nosocomial transmission and costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:1134–1141.Google Scholar