Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:15:08.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Zu lieben und zu arbeiten: Was Freud right all along?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2019

Jeffrey M. Cucina Open the ORCID record for Jeffrey M. Cucina [Opens in a new window] ,
Theodore L. Hayes Open the ORCID record for Theodore L. Hayes [Opens in a new window]  and
Philip T. Walmsley
Jeffrey M. Cucina*
Affiliation:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Theodore L. Hayes
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Justice
Philip T. Walmsley
Affiliation:
Washington, DC
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 199 - 205
Copyright
© Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

All authors contributed equally and are listed in alphabetical order.

The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Federal Government, or any agency of the U.S. Federal Government.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Binning, J. F., & Barrett, G. V. (1989). Validity of personnel decisions: A conceptual analysis of the inferential and evidential bases. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 478–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, D. H., Sauer-Zavala, S., Carl, J. R., Bullis, J. R., & Ellard, K. K. (2014). The nature, diagnosis, and treatment of neuroticism: Back to the future. Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 344–365. doi: 10.1177/2167702613505532 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, J. D., Narayan, M., Anderson, E. R., Staib, L. H., Miller, H. L., & Charney, D. S. (2000). Hippocampal volume reduction in major depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 115–118. doi: 10.1176/ajp.157.1.115 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Holzmeister, F., Ho, T.-H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., … Wu, H., (2018). Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behavior, 2, 637–644. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, N. T., Dalal, D. K., Boyce, A. S., O’Connell, M. S., Kung, M. C., & Delgado, K. M. (2014). Uncovering curvilinear relationships between conscientiousness and job performance: How theoretically appropriate measurement makes an empirical difference. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 564–586. 10.1037/a0034688 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carter, N. T., Miller, J. D., & Widiger, T. A. (2018). Extreme personalities at work and in life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 429–436. doi: 10.1177/0963721418793134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. doi: 10.1037/h0040957 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elms, A. C. (2001). Apocryphal Freud: Sigmund Freud’s most famous “quotations” and their actual sources. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 29, 83–104.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. Oxford, UK: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Feinstein, S. B., Fallon, B. A., Petkova, E., & Liebowitz, M. R. (2003). Item-by-item factor analysis of the Yale–Brown obsessive compulsive scale symptom checklist. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 15(2), 187–193. doi: 10.1176/jnp.15.2.187 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, W. K., Price, L. H., Rasmussen, S. A., Mazure, C., Fleischmann, R. L., Hill, C. L., … Charney, D. S. (1989a). The Yale–Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale I. Development, use, and reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46(11), 1006–1011. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110048007 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, W. K., Price, L. H., Rasmussen, S. A., Mazure, C., Delgado, P., Heninger, G. R., & Charney, D. S. (1989b). The Yale–Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale II. Validity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46(11), 1012–1016. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110054008 Google ScholarPubMed
Guion, R. M. (2011). Assessment, measurement, and prediction for personnel decisions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International OCD Foundation. (2016). Adapted version of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Boston, MA: Author. Retrieved from https://iocdf.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/04-Y-BOCS-w-Checklist.pdf.Google Scholar
Lahey, B. B., Krueger, R. F., Rathouz, P. J., Waldman, I. D., & Zald, D. H. (2017). A hierarchical causal taxonomy of psychopathology across the lifespan. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 142–186. doi: 10.1037/bul0000069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaHuis, D. M., Martin, N. R. and Avis, J. M. (2005). Investigating nonlinear conscientiousness—job performance relations for clerical employees. Human Performance, 18, 199–212. doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup1803_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le, H., Oh, I., Robbins, S. B., Ilies, R., Holland, E., & Westrick, P. (2011). Too much of a good thing: Curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 113–133. doi: 10.1037/a0021016 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maples, J. L., Guan, L., Carter, N. T., & Miller, J. D. (2014). A test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 26(4), 1070–1084. doi: 10.1037/pas0000004 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melson-Silimon, A., Harris, A. M., Shoenfelt, E. L., Miller, J. D., & Carter, N. T. (2019). Personality testing and the Americans with Disabilities Act: Cause for concern as normal and abnormal personality models are integrated. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12(2), 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickel, L. B., Roberts, B. W., & Chernyshenko, O. S. (2019). No evidence of a curvilinear relation between conscientiousness and relationship, work, and health outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116, 296–312. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000176 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Omura, K., Constable, R. T., & Canli, T. (2005). Amygdala gray matter concentration is associated with extraversion and neuroticism. Neuroreport, 16, 1905–1908. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000186596.64458.76 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pelphrey, K. A., & Morris, J. P. (2006). Brain mechanisms for interpreting the actions of others from biological-motion cues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 136–140. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00423.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Putka, D. J., & Sackett, P. R. (2012). Reliability and validity. In Farr, J. L. and Tippins, N. T. (Eds.), Handbook of Employee Selection (pp. 9–49). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rauch, S. L., Milad, M. R., Orr, S. P., Quinn, B. T., Fischl, B., & Pitman, R. K. (2005). Orbitofrontal thickness, retention of fear extinction, and extraversion. Neuroreport, 16, 1909–1912. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000186599.66243.50 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 117–141. doi: 10.1037/bul0000088 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robie, C., & Ryan, A. M. (1999). Effects of nonlinearity and heteroscedasticity on the validity of conscientiousness in predicting overall job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7(3), 157–169. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., & Oh, I.-S. (2016). The crisis of confidence in research findings in psychology: Is lack of replication the real problem? Or is it something else? Archives of Scientific Psychology, 4, 32–37. doi: 10.1037/arc0000029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walmsley, P. T., Sackett, P. R., & Nichols, S. B. (2018). A large sample investigation of the presence of nonlinear personality-job performance relationships. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 26, 145–163. doi: 10.1111/ijsa.12223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wernimont, P. F., & Campbell, J. P. (1968). Signs, samples, and criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52(5), 372–376. doi: 10.1037/h0026244 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whetzel, D. L., McDaniel, M. A., Yost, A. P., & Kim, N. (2010). Linearity of personality-performance relationships: A large-scale examination. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(3), 310–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00514.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the credibility revolution for productivity, creativity, and progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 411–417. doi: 10.1177/1745691617751884 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed