Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:54:04.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When and How Are Multiple Leaders Most Effective? It's Complex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Scott B. Dust  and
Jonathan C. Ziegert
Scott B. Dust*
Affiliation:
Drexel University
Jonathan C. Ziegert
Affiliation:
Drexel University
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Department of Management, LeBow College of Business, Drexel University, 101 N. 33rd St., Paul Peck PSR Building Suite 320, Philadelphia, PA 19104
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 421 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Zelditch, M. Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction. New York, NY: Elsevier. Google Scholar
Brass, D. J., & Krackhardt, D. (1999). The social capital of twenty-first century leaders. In Hunt, J. G., Dodge, G. E., & Wong, L. (Eds.), Out-of-the-box leadership: Transforming the twenty-first-century army and other top-performing organizations (pp. 179–194). Stamford, CT: JAI. Google Scholar
Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1217–1234. Google Scholar
Crevani, L., Lindgren, M., & Packendorff, J. (2010). Leadership, not leaders: On the study of leadership as practices and interactions. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26, 77–86. Google Scholar
Denis, J.-L., Langley, A., & Sergi, V. (2012). Leadership in the plural. The Academy of Management Annals, 1–73. Google Scholar
Friedrich, T. L., Vessey, W. B., Schuelke, M. J., Ruark, G. A., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). A framework for understanding collective leadership: The selective utilization of leader and team expertise within networks. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 933–958. Google Scholar
Gronn, P. (1999). Substituting for leadership: The neglected role of the leadership couple. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 41–62. Google Scholar
Ilgen, D. R., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (1991). The structure of work: Jobs and roles. In Dunnette, M. D., & Hough, L. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 2; pp. 165–208). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Google Scholar
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York, NY: Wiley. Google Scholar
Klein, K. J., Ziegert, J. C., Knight, A. P., & Xiao, Y. (2006). Dynamic delegation: Shared, hierarchical, and deindividualized leadership in extreme action teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 590–621. Google Scholar
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 535–546. Google Scholar
Pearce, C. L. (2004). The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 47–57. Google Scholar
Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P. Jr. (2002). The relative influence of vertical vs. shared leadership on the longitudinal effectiveness of change management teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 172–197. Google Scholar
Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467–1478. Google Scholar
Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 357–381. Google Scholar
Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In Staw, B. M., & Cummings, L. L (Eds), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 20; pp. 77–120). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar
Yammarino, F. J., Salas, E., Serban, A., Shirreffs, K., & Shuffler, M. L. (2012). Collectivistic leadership approaches: Putting the “we” in leadership science and practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 382–402.Google Scholar