Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:39:10.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

We Are…More Than Football: Three Stories of Identity Threat by Penn State Insiders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Alicia A. Grandey*
Affiliation:
Penn State University
Morgan A. Krannitz
Affiliation:
Penn State University
Tyler Slezak
Affiliation:
Penn State University
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802

Extract

For many, Penn State is synonymous with football and Coach Joe Paterno, an association that has been a source of pride for many alumni, staff, and students for years. As Alderfer's (2013) article summarizes, that overlap has now made the horrific behaviors of the former football coach Sandusky indelibly connected to Penn State. Alderfer argues that the scandal can be explained by the actions or inactions of nine Penn State groups “whose collective behavior first allowed the criminal acts to occur and then put an end to them” (p. 117).

Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderfer, C. P. (2013). Not just football: An intergroup perspective on the Sandusky scandal at Penn State. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6, 117133.Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 2039.Google Scholar
Branscombe, N. R., & Wann, D. L. (1991). The positive social and self-concept consequences of sport team identification. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 15, 115127.Google Scholar
Branscombe, N. R., & Wann, D. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641657.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366375.Google Scholar
Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239263.Google Scholar
Elsbach, K. D., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Members' responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the business week rankings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 442476.Google Scholar
Ethier, K. A., & Deaux, K. (1994). Negotiating social identity when contexts change: Maintaining identification and responding to threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 243251.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. H., Ashforth, B. E., & Corley, K. G. (2009). Organizational sacralization and sacrilege. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 225254.Google Scholar
Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103123.Google Scholar
Mael, F. A., & Ashforth, B. E. (1995). Loyal from day one: Biodata, organizational identification, and turnover among newcomers. Personnel Psychology, 48(2), 309333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, C. R., Lassegard, M., & Ford, C. E. (1986). Distancing after group success and failure: Basking in reflected glory and cutting off reflected failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 382388.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Voci, A. (2006). The link between identification and in-group favouritism: Effects of threat to social identity and trust-related emotions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 265284.Google Scholar