Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T08:58:58.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sequential Cross-Cultural Learning: From Dimensions to Cultural Metaphors to Paradoxes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Martin J. Gannon*
Affiliation:
California State University San Marcos
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: College of Business Administration, California State University San Marcos, San Marcos, CA 92096

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, N., & Gunderson, A. (2007). International dimensions of organizational behavior (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western. Google Scholar
Altman, Y., Berry, M., Cerotti, P., Davison, C., Gannon, M., Nielsen, C., Scheraga, C. (2012). Applications of cultural metaphors and cross-cultural paradoxes in training and education. Friedlmeier, W. (Ed.), On-line readings of psychology and culture. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/orpc/ Google Scholar
Gannon, M. J. (2001). Working across cultures: Applications and exercises. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved from http://faculty.csusm.edu/mgannon Google Scholar
Gannon, M. J. (2008). Paradoxes of culture and globalization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Gannon, M. J. (2011). Cultural metaphors: Their use in management practice as a method for understanding cultures. Friedlmeier, W. (Ed.), On-line readings of psychology and culture. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/orpc/. (An earlier version of this article was published in Lonner, L., 2003. On-line readings in cross-cultural psychology.)Google Scholar
Gannon, M. J. and Associates. (1994). Understanding global cultures: Metaphorical journeys through 17 nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Google Scholar
Gannon, M. J., & Deb, P. (in progress). Comparing cross-cultural dimensions, cultural metaphors, and cross-cultural paradoxes: Research, teaching, and applications.Google Scholar
Gannon, M. J., & Pillai, R. (2013 c., publication date of May 2012). Understanding global cultures: Metaphorical journeys through 31 nations, clusters of nations, continents, and diversity (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Google Scholar
Gannon, M., Gupta, A., Audia, P., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2005/2006). Cultural metaphors as frames of reference for nations: A six-nation study. International Studies of Management and Organization, 35, 47.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980, 2001). Culture's consequences— International differences in work-related values (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Holt, K., & Seki, K. (2012). Global leadership: A developmental shift for everyone. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5, 198217.Google Scholar
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Kluckholn, E., & Stodtbeck, F. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson. Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Osland, J., & Osland, A. (2005/2006). Expatriate paradoxes and cultural involvement. International Studies of Management & Organization, 35, 115132.Google Scholar
Quinn, R., & Cameron, K. (1988). Paradox and transformation. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. Google Scholar
Smith, K., & Berg, D. (1987, 1997). Paradoxes of group life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. (Paperback edition with a new introduction was published in 1997.)Google Scholar
Smith, W., & Lewis, M. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36, 381403.Google Scholar