Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:45:11.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Senior Leaders Are Extreme Cases, Not Special Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Michael A. Gillespie  and
L. David Marquet
Michael A. Gillespie*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of South Florida
L. David Marquet
Affiliation:
Turn the Ship Around
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Michael A. Gillespie, Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, 8350 N. Tamiami Trail B322, Sarasota, FL 34243. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recent discussions have focused on the special circumstances surrounding assessment and development for senior leadership (Reynolds, McCauley, Tsacoumis, and the Jeanneret Symposium Participants, 2018). The fundamental assertion is that different challenges are inherent in working with senior leadership, as compared to lower levels of leadership. We suggest that, although the focal article presents a useful synthesis of research and practice, many of the points made are applicable to leaders at all levels. In other words, by looking at senior leaders, we gain an increased appreciation for issues that are in fact relevant to all leaders.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , December 2018 , pp. 682 - 685
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (5), 1217–1234.Google Scholar
Gillespie, M. A., Gillespie, J. Z., Sliter, K. A., Colatat, M. C., Nolan, K. P., & Guion, R. M. (2017). An SK BARS system: Ongoing performance management with municipal police. Public Personnel Management, 44, 169–191. doi:0091026017738538.Google Scholar
Marquet, L. D. (2013). Turn the ship around! A true story of turning followers into leaders. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
Pearce, C. L. (2004). The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18, 47–57.Google Scholar
Reynolds, D., McCauley, C., Tsacoumis, S., and Participants, the Jeanneret Symposium. (2018). A critical evaluation of the state of assessment and development for senior leaders. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 11 (4), 630–652.Google Scholar
Smith, J. A., & Foti, R. J. (1998). A pattern approach to the study of leader emergence. The Leadership Quarterly, 9 (2), 147–160.Google Scholar
Navy, US. (1959). Naval leadership (2nd ed.). Annapolis, MD: USNI.Google Scholar
Van Dyck, C., Frese, M., Baer, M., & Sonnentag, S. (2005). Organizational error management culture and its impact on performance: A two-study replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (6), 1228–1240.Google Scholar
Yammarino, F. J., Salas, E., Serban, A., Shirreffs, K., & Shuffler, M. L. (2012). Collectivistic leadership approaches: Putting the “we” in leadership science and practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5 (4), 382–402.Google Scholar