Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T16:05:01.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Safeguarding Access and Safeguarding Meaning as Strategies for Achieving Confidentiality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Erich C. Fein  and
Carol T. Kulik
Erich C. Fein*
Affiliation:
University of South Australia
Carol T. Kulik
Affiliation:
University of South Australia
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: School of Management, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 479 - 481
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kulik, C. T. (2011). Climbing the higher mountain: The challenges of multilevel, multisource, and longitudinal research designs. Management and Organization Review. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00226.x.Google Scholar
Saari, L. M., & Scherbaum, C. A. (2011). Identified employee surveys: Potential promise, perils, and professional practice guidelines. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 435–448.Google Scholar
Sieber, J. E. (1992). Planning ethically responsible research: A guide for students and internal review boards. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Sieber, J. E. (2004). Empirical research on research ethics. Ethics & Behavior, 14, 397–412. Google Scholar