Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T01:09:16.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resilience: Distinct Construct or Conglomerate of Existing Traits?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

Gerard J. Fogarty  and
Harsha N. Perera
Gerard J. Fogarty*
Affiliation:
Australian Centre for Sustainable Business and Development, University of Southern Queensland, Queensland, Australia
Harsha N. Perera
Affiliation:
School of Education, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia, and School of Linguistics, Adult and Specialist Education, University of Southern Queensland, Queensland, Australia
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Gerard J. Fogarty, Australian Centre for Sustainable Business and Development, University of Southern Queensland, Baker Street, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since its inception in mainstream scientific psychology, resilience has emerged as a popular, yet controversial, construct. As evidenced in the target article, this controversy can be attributed, at least in part, to current conceptual and methodological difficulties hampering understanding of the construct. Chief among these concerns is the discriminant validity of resilience with respect to conceptually similar individual differences constructs, such as hardiness, mental toughness, adaptability, and even the five-factor personality dimensions. Advances in research on resilience, and ultimately the utility of the construct in applied settings, hinge on its distinction from related concepts.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 422 - 429
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Britt, T. W., Shen, W., Sinclair, R. R., Grossman, M. R., & Klieger, D. M. (2016). How much do we really know about employee resilience? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9 (2), 378–404.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cherniss, C. (2010). Emotional intelligence: Toward clarification of a concept. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3 (2), 110–126.Google Scholar
Fink, G. (2007). Encyclopedia of stress (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fletcher, D., & Sakar, M. (2013). Psychological resilience: A review and critique of definitions, concepts and theory. European Psychologist, 18, 12–23. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000124Google Scholar
Fogarty, G. J., Furst, A., Thomas, P., & Perera, N. (2016). Evaluating measures of sport confidence and optimism. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/1091367X.2015.1111220Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., Erez, A., & Bono, J. E. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (3), 693–710.Google Scholar
Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Yonkers, NY: World.Google Scholar
Khoozani, E. N., & Hadzic, M. (2010). Designing the human stress ontology: A formal framework to capture and represent knowledge about human stress. Australian Psychologist, 45 (4), 258–273. doi:10.1080/00050061003664811Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (1994). Sport motivation orientations: Beware of jingle-jangle fallacies. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16, 365–380.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2012). Emotional intelligence: A promise unfulfilled? Japanese Psychological Research, 54, 105–127. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5884.2011.00502.xGoogle Scholar
McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37 (1), 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004Google Scholar
Perera, H. N., & DiGiacomo, M. (2015). The role of trait emotional intelligence in academic performance during the university transition: An integrative model of mediation via social support, coping, and adjustment. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 208–213. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.001Google Scholar
Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2001). Trait emotional intelligence: Psychometric investigation with reference to established trait taxonomies. European Journal of Personality, 15, 425–448. doi:10.1002/per.416Google Scholar
Sakar, M., & Fletcher, D. (2014). Psychological resilience in sport performers: A review of stressors and protective factors. Journal of Sports Sciences, 32, 1419–1434. doi:10.1080/02640414.2014.901551Google Scholar
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9, 185–211.Google Scholar
Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (2003). The structure of personality attributes. In Barrick, M. R. & Ryan, A. M. (Eds.), Personality and work: Reconsidering the role of personality in organizations (pp. 1–29). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Saucier, G., & Ostendorf, F. (1999). Hierarchical subcomponents of the Big Five personality factors: A cross-language replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76 (4), 613–627. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.613Google Scholar
Vernon, P. A., Villani, V. C., Schermer, J. A., & Petrides, K. V. (2008). Phenotypic and genetic associations between the Big Five and trait emotional intelligence. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 11, 524–530. doi:10.1375/twin.11.5.524Google Scholar
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465–490.Google Scholar
Windle, G. (2011). What is resilience? A review and concept analysis. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 21, 152–169. doi:1017/S0959259810000420Google Scholar