Hostname: page-component-69cd664f8f-5rtl5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-12T09:39:39.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reappraising the Brain Drain: Collaboration as a Catalyst for Innovation in Industrial–Organizational Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Lily D. Cushenbery  and
Allison S. Gabriel
Lily D. Cushenbery*
Affiliation:
Stony Brook University
Allison S. Gabriel*
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth University
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: College of Business, Stony Brook University, 256 Harriman Hall, Stony Brook, NY 11794
E-mail: [email protected], Address: School of Business, Virginia Commonwealth University, 301 West Main Street P.O. Box 844000, Richmond, VA 23284-4000
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 347 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguinis, H., Bradley, K. J., & Brodersen, A. (2014). Industrial–organizational psychologists in business schools: Brain drain or eye opener? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7(3), 284–303.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M., Hennessey, B. A., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 14–23.Google Scholar
Anderson, N., & West, M. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 235–258.Google Scholar
Bain, P., Mann, L., & Pirola-Merlo, A. (2001). The innovation imperative: The relationships between team climate, innovation, and performance in research and development teams. Small Group Research, 32(1), 55–73. doi: 10.1177/104649640103200103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., & Farr, J. L. (2009). A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2, 305–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, T., & Keller, R. T. (2003). Leadership in research and development organizations: A literature review and conceptual framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 587–606. doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00053-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erez, M., & Gati, E. (2004). A dynamic, multi-level model of culture: From the micro level of the individual to the macro level of a global culture. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(4), 583–598.Google Scholar
Folkestad, J., & Gonzalez, R. (2010). Teamwork for innovation: A content analysis of the highly read and highly cited literature on innovation. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12(1), 115–136. doi: 10.1177/1523422310365486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilson, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2004). A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams' engagement in creative processes. Journal of Management, 30(4), 453–470. doi: 10.1016/j.jm.2003.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. (2013). The gift we love to receive but forget to give. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/adam-grant/the-gift-we-love-to-recei_b_4342794.htmlGoogle Scholar
Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128–1145. doi: 10.1037/a0015978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, S. T., & Cushenbery, L. (2011). Leading for innovation: Direct and indirect influences. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13(3), 248–265. doi: 10.1177/1523422311424263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, S. T., Bedell-Avers, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). The typical leadership study: Assumptions, implications, and potential remedies. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(5), 435–446. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.07.001Google Scholar
Jaussi, K. S., & Dionne, S. D. (2003). Leading for creativity: The role of unconventional leader behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 475–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, N., & Anderson, N. (1990). Innovation in working groups. In West, M. A. & Farr, J. L. (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work (pp. 81–100). Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., & Licuanan, B. (2004). Leading for innovation: Conclusions, issues, and directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705–750. doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00158-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry-Smith, J., & Shalley, C. (2003). The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 89–106.Google Scholar
Schneider, B., Goldstein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. (1995). The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology, 48, 747–773. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01780.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, S., & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 703–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 591–620. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00173.xGoogle Scholar