Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:25:21.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Publish or perish, but what about practice?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2020

Alicia S. Davis Open the ORCID record for Alicia S. Davis [Opens in a new window] ,
Sofia S. Van Sickle ,
Saskia Shirley  and
Jennifer Feitosa
Alicia S. Davis
Affiliation:
Claremont Graduate University
Sofia S. Van Sickle
Affiliation:
Scripps College
Saskia Shirley
Affiliation:
Claremont McKenna College
Jennifer Feitosa*
Affiliation:
Claremont McKenna College
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 2020 , pp. 312 - 315
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguinis, H., Ramani, R., Campbell, P., Bernal-Turnes, P., Drewry, J., & Edgerton, B. (2017). Most frequently cited sources, articles, and authors in industrial-organizational psychology textbooks: Implications for the science–practice divide, scholarly impact, and the future of the field. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 10(4), 507–557.10.1017/iop.2017.69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonakis, J. (2017). On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications. Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, J. (2017). A comparative study of the impact of Korean research articles in four academic fields using altmetrics. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 18(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-02-2016-0005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, K., McKenzie, C. R. M., & Müller-Trede, J. (2019). Do publications in low impact journals help or hurt a CV? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 25(4), 744–752.Google ScholarPubMed
Extejt, M. M., & Smith, J. E. (1990). The behavioral sciences and management: An evaluation of relevant journals. Journal of Management, 16(3), 539–551.10.1177/014920639001600302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, A., Reeder, R., & Hyun, J. (2011). Survey of editors and reviewers of high impact psychology journals: Statistical and research design problems in submitted manuscripts. Journal of Psychology, 145(3), 195–209.10.1080/00223980.2011.555431CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heskett, J. (2005, July 4). How can business schools be made more relevant? Harvard Business School. https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/4886.html Google Scholar
Highhouse, S., Zickar, M. J., & Melick, S. R. (2020). Prestige and relevance of the scholarly journals: Impressions of SIOP members. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 13(3), 273–290.Google Scholar
Hoffman, A. J. (2017, March 28). In praise of “B” journals. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2017/03/28/academics-shouldnt-focus-only-prestigious-journals-essay Google Scholar
Machado, C., & Davim, J. P. (Eds.). (2018). Organizational behavior and human resource management: A guide to specialized MBA course. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, S. J., & Hunt, C. S. (2006). Not quite as simple as A-B-C: Reflections on one department’s experiences with publication ranking. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(3), 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rupp, D. E., & Beal, D. (2007). Checking in with the scientist–practitioner model: How are we doing? The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 45(1), 35–45.Google Scholar
Schimanski, L. A., & Alperin, J. P. (2018). The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future. F1000Research, 7(1605), 1–21.10.12688/f1000research.16493.1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seglen, P. O. (1998). Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 69(3), 224–229.10.3109/17453679809000920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, R., & Rich, P. (2012). Rigor, impact and prestige: A proposed framework for evaluating scholarly publications. Innovative Higher Education, 37(5), 359–371.10.1007/s10755-012-9214-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar