Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:54:46.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Overqualified Women: What Can Be Done About This Potentially Bad Situation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Aleksandra Luksyte  and
Christiane Spitzmueller
Aleksandra Luksyte*
Affiliation:
University of Houston
Christiane Spitzmueller
Affiliation:
University of Houston
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Department of Psychology, University of Houston, 126 Heyne Building, Houston, TX 77204-5022
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 256 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422–436. doi:10.1037/h0040968Google Scholar
Babcock, L., Laschever, S., Gelfand, M., & Small, D. (2003). Nice girls don't ask. Harvard Business Review, 81, 14–16. Google Scholar
Balkin, D. B., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2002). Explaining the gender effects on faculty pay increases: Do the squeaky wheels get the grease? Group & Organization Management, 27, 352. Google Scholar
Blackaby, D., Booth, A. L., & Frank, J. (2005). Outside offers and the gender pay gap: Empirical evidence from the UK academic labor market. Economic Journal, 115, F81–F107. doi:10.1111/j.0013-0133.2005.00973.xGoogle Scholar
Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2007). The gender pay gap: Have women gone as far as they can? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 7–23. Google Scholar
Bowles, H. R., & Babcock, L. C. (2008, November 3). Relational accounts: An answer for Women to the compensation negotiation dilemma. HKS Working Paper No. RWP08-066. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1296669.Google Scholar
Bowles, H., & Flynn, F. (2010). Gender and persistence in negotiation: A dyadic perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 769–787. Google Scholar
Büchel, F., & Battu, H. (2003). The theory of differential overqualification: Does it work? Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 50, 1–16. Google Scholar
Cha, Y. (2010). Reinforcing separate spheres: The effect of spousal overwork on men's and women's employment in dual-earner households. American Sociological Review, 75, 303–329. doi:10.1177/0003122410365307Google Scholar
Eagly, A., & Sczesny, S. (2009). Stereotypes about women, men, and leaders: Have times changed? In Barreto, M., Ryan, M. K., Schmitt, M. T., Barreto, M., Ryan, M. K., & Schmitt, M. T. (Eds.), The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality (pp. 21–47). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11863-002Google Scholar
Erdogan, B., Bauer, T. N., Peiró, J. M., & Truxillo, D. M. (2011). Overqualified employees: Making the best of a potentially bad situation for individuals and organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives of Science and Practice, 4, 215–232.Google Scholar
Folger, R., & Martin, C. (1986). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 531–546. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90049-1Google Scholar
Frank, R. H. (1978). Why women earn less: The theory and estimation of differential overqualification. The American Economic Review, 68, 360–373. Google Scholar
Grady, G., & McCarthy, A. (2008). Work-life integration: Experiences of mid-career professional working mothers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 599–622. Google Scholar
Hoobler, J., Wayne, S., & Lemmon, G. (2009). Bosses' perceptions of family-work conflict and women's promotability: Glass ceiling effects. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 939–957. Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., & Livingston, B. A. (2008). Is the gap more than gender? A longitudinal analysis of gender, gender role orientation, and earnings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 994–1012. Google Scholar
Kelleher, J. (2007, March 21). In dual-earner couples, family roles are changing in U.S. Retrieved from www.america.gov/st/washfileenglish/2007/March/20070321162913berehellek0.6708338.html#xzz15Z5dP4W8 Google Scholar
Luksyte, A., Spitzmueller, C., & Maynard, D. (in press). Why do overqualified incumbents deviate? Examining multiple mediators. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. Retrieved from http://rapidproof.cadmus.com/RapidProof/retrieval/index.jsp Google Scholar
Lyness, K., & Heilman, M. (2006). When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 777–785. Google Scholar
McGoldrick, K., & Robst, J. (1996). Gender differences in overeducation: A test of the theory of differential overqualification. American Economic Review, 86, 280–284. Google Scholar
Powell, G., & Greenhaus, J. (2010). Sex, gender, and the work-to-family interface: Exploring negative and positive interdependencies. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 513–534. Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor (2009, November). Employment and earnings, 2009 annual averages and the monthly labor review. Retrieved from www.dol.gov/wb/stats/main.htm Google Scholar
Wald, S. (2005). The impact of overqualification on job search. International Journal of Manpower, 26, 140–156. Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Bowling, N. A., & Eschleman, K. J. (2010). A meta-analytic examination of work and general locus of control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 761–768. doi:10.1037/a0017707Google Scholar