Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:57:41.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linking I-O and Lean: Lessons from high performance work systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2019

Mahesh Subramony
Mahesh Subramony*
Affiliation:
Northern Illinois University
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 2019 , pp. 264 - 266
Copyright
© Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high performance work systems pay off. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Balzer, W. K., Brodke, M. H., Kluse, C., & Zickar, M. J. (2019). Revolution or 30-year fad? A role for I-O psychology in Lean management. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12(3), 215–233.Google Scholar
Barney, J., & Felin, T. (2013). What are microfoundations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 138–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. D. (1982). The missing opportunity in organizational research: Some implications for a theory of work performance. Academy of Management Review, 7, 560–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boselie, P., Dietz, G., & Boone, C. (2005). Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(3), 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635–672.Google Scholar
Huselid, M. A., & Becker, B. E. (2011). Bridging micro and macro domains: Workforce differentiation and strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, 37, 421–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, K., Lepak, D., Hu, J., & Baer, J.C. (2012). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1264–1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDuffie, J. (1995). Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48, 197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subramony, M. (2009). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between HRM bundles and firm performance. Human Resource Management, 48, 745–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar