Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:22:30.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linking Clinical and Industrial Psychology: Autism Spectrum Disorder at Work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Elisabeth L. Hill
Elisabeth L. Hill*
Affiliation:
Goldsmiths College, University of London
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths College, University of London, London, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 152 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, C., Auyeung, B., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2012). Toward brief “Red Flags” for autism screening: The Short Autism Spectrum Quotient and the Short Quantitative Checklist in 1,000 cases and 3,000 controls. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 51, 202–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington DC: Author.Google Scholar
Baird, G., Simonoff, E., Pickles, A., Chandler, S., Loucas, T., Meldrum, D., & Charman, T. (2006). Prevalence of disorders of the autism spectrum in a population cohort of children in South Thames: the Special Needs and Autism Project (SNAP). Lancet, 368, 210–215.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger Syndrome/High-Functioning Autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berthoz, S., Lalanne, C., Crane, L., & Hill, E. L. (2013). Investigating emotional impairments in adults with autism spectrum disorders and the broader autism phenotype. Psychiatry Research, 208, 257–326.Google Scholar
Equality Act. (2010). Her Majesty's Stationary Office, UK.Google Scholar
Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2006). The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron, 50, 531–534.Google Scholar
Guenole, N. (2014). Maladaptive personality at work: Exploring the darkness. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7(1), 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, E. L. (2004). Executive dysfunction in autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 26–32.Google Scholar
Hill, E. L., Berthoz, S., & Frith, U. (2004). Brief report: Cognitive processing of own emotions in individuals with autistic spectrum disorder and in their relatives. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 229–235.Google Scholar
Hill, E. L., Dockery, L., McIntosh, B., & Perkins, D. (2012). Mental health and Asperger syndrome: The role of occupational health professionals. Occupational Health [At Work], 12, 16–19.Google Scholar
Hill, E. L., McIntosh, B., & Perkins, D. (2011). Reaching and understanding. The HR & Training Journal, 10, 89–91.Google Scholar
Knapp, M., Romeo, R., & Beecham, J. (2009). Economic cost of autism in the UK. Autism, 13, 317–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2013). The Personality Inventory for DSM-5—Brief Form (PID-5-BF)—Adult. American Psychiatric Association: Author.Google Scholar
Sucksmith, E., Roth, I., & Hoekstra, R. A. (2011). Autistic traits below the clinical threshold: Re-examining the broader autism phenotype in the 21st century. Neuropsychology Review, 21, 360–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar