Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T20:04:55.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Let Us Not Become Too Narrow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Greg L. Stewart
Greg L. Stewart*
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Department of Management & Organizations, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 317 - 319
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Management & Organizations, University of Iowa

References

Barry, B., & Stewart, G. L. (1998). Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 62–78.Google Scholar
Bell, S. T. (2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 595–615.Google Scholar
Fleishman, E. A., & Quaintance, M. K. (1984). Taxonomies of human performance: The description of human tasks. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hough, L. M., & Oswald, F. L. (2008). Personality testing and industrial–organizational psychology: Reflections, progress, and prospects. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 272–290.Google Scholar
Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Stewart, G. L. (1998). Personality predictors of performance in jobs involving interaction with others. Human Performance, 11, 145–166.Google Scholar
Rushton, J. P., Bons, T. A., & Hur, Y. (in press). The genetics and evolution of the general factor in personality. Journal of Research in Personality.Google Scholar
Ryan, A. M., McFarland, L., Baron, H., & Page, R. (1999). An international look at selection practices: Nation and culture as explanations for variability in practice. Personnel Psychology, 52, 359–391.Google Scholar
Stewart, G. L. Fulmer, I. S., & Barrick, M. R. (2005). An exploration of member roles as a multilevel linking mechanism for individual traits and team outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 58, 343–365.Google Scholar
Susman, J. I. (1976). Autonomy at work: A socio-technical analysis of participative management. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Toquam, J. L., Macaulay, J. L., Westra, C. D., Fujita, Y., & Murphy, S. E. (1997). Assessment of nuclear power plant performance variability. In Brannick, M. T., Salas, E., & Prince, C. (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement (pp. 253–287). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar