Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T14:01:38.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leadership and Responses to Organizational Crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Stephen H. Wagner
Stephen H. Wagner*
Affiliation:
Governors State University
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Division of Management, Marketing, & Public Administration, Governors State University, 1 University Parkway (G275), University Park, IL 60484
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The tragic failure of Penn State University to effectively respond to years of child sex abuse perpetrated by Jerry Sandusky was both a breakdown of leaders and of leadership systems. Numerous individual leaders at Penn State had the knowledge, power, and interpersonal influence to effectively intervene in support of Jerry Sandusky's victims. However, fully understanding how this tragedy occurred also requires an examination of the organizational system of leadership that enabled each leader to rationalize the cover up of the sexual abuse of children. Alderfer's (2011) laws of embedded intergroup relations are useful for understanding the organizational dysfunction at Penn State; especially when those laws are integrated with other theories of organizational psychology, including the social identity maintenance theory of groupthink, the romance of leadership, and authentic leadership. The integration of these theories suggests specific strategies and tactics for preventing similar lapses of ethical behavior in the future through the development of leaders and leadership systems.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 140 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderfer, C. P. (2011). The practice of organizational diagnosis: Theory and methods. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alderfer, C. P. (2013). Not just football: An intergroup perspective on the Sandusky scandal at Penn State. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6, 117–133.Google Scholar
Avolio, B. J. (2010). Pursuing authentic leadership development. In Nohria, N., & Khurana, R. (Eds.), Handbook of leadership theory and practice (pp. 739–768). Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. (2003). Optimal distinctiveness, social identity, and the self. In Leary, M. R., & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
vanDyck, C., Frese, M., Baer, M., & Sonnentag, S. (2005). Organizational error management culture and its impact on performance: A two-study replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1228.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1910). Future prospects of psychoanalytic therapy. In Strachey, J. (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Volume 11 (pp. 139–151)). London, England: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Meindl, J. R. (1998). Appendix: Measures and assessments for the romance of leadership approach. In Dansereau, F., & Yammarino, F. J. (Eds.), Leadership: The multiple-level approaches—part B: Contemporary and alternative (pp. 299–302). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Meindl, J. R., Ehrlich, S. B., & Dukerich, J. M. (1985). The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 78–102.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.Google Scholar
Turner, M. E., & Pratkanis, A. R. (1998). A social identity maintenance model of groupthink. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 210–235.Google Scholar
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34, 89–126.Google Scholar