Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:29:45.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IOOB Already Takes JDM Seriously, but Is It Reciprocated?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Theodore L. Hayes  and
Jessica D. Wooldridge
Theodore L. Hayes*
Affiliation:
U.S. Office of Personnel Management
Jessica D. Wooldridge*
Affiliation:
U.S. Office of Personnel Management
*
E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected], Address: HRS&ES, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E St. NW, Washington, DC 20415
E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected], Address: HRS&ES, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E St. NW, Washington, DC 20415
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 406 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arkes, H.R. (1991). Costs and errors of judgment biases: Implications for debiasing. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 486–498. Google Scholar
Bartram, D. (2005). The great eight competencies: A criterion-centric approach to validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1185–1203. Google Scholar
Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 938–956. Google Scholar
Chan, D. (2010). Values, styles, and motivational constructs. In Farr, J. L. & Tippins, N. T. (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection (pp. 321–337). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
Dalal, R. S., Bonaccio, S., Highhouse, S., Ilgen, D. R., Mohammed, S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2010). What if industrial–organizational psychology decided to take workplace decisions seriously? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 386–405.Google Scholar
Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1981). Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgment and choice. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 53–88. Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. (1996). On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky (1996). Psychological Review, 103, 592–596. Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. (2006). Heuristics. In Gigerenzer, G. & Engel, C. (Eds.), Heuristics and the law (pp. 17–44). Cambridge, MA: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press and Freie Universität Berlin. Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W., Kurz-Milcke, E., Schwartz, L., & Woloshin, S. (2008). Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 53–96. Google Scholar
Henriksson, M. P., Elwin, E., & Juslin, P. (2010). What is coded into memory in the absence of outcome feedback? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1–16. Google Scholar
Highhouse, S. (2001). Judgment and decision-making research: Relevance to industrial and organizational psychology. In Anderson, N., Ones, D. S., Sinangil, H. K., & Viswesvaran, C. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 314–331). London: Sage. Google Scholar
Highhouse, S. (2008). Facts are stubborn things. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 373–376. Google Scholar
Hogan, J., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R. B. (2010). Management derailment. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol 3: Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization (pp. 555–575). Washington, DC: APA. Google Scholar
Hogan, R., Hogan, J., & Barrett, P. (2008). Good judgment: The intersection of intelligence and personality. In Chebykin, O. Y., Bedny, G. Z., & Karwowski, W. (Eds.), Ergonomics and psychology: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 357–375). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Google Scholar
Hough, L., & Dilchert, S. (2010). Personality: Its measurement and validity for employee selection. In Farr, J. L. & Tippins, N. T. (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection (pp. 299–319). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
Howell, W. C., & Burnett, S. A. (1978). Uncertainty measurement: A cognitive taxonomy. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 45–68. Google Scholar
Jacoby, J., Mazursky, D., Troutman, T., & Kuss, A. (1984). When feedback is ignored: Disutility of outcome feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 531–545. Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720. Google Scholar
Larrick, R. P. (1993). Motivational factors in decision theories: The role of self-protection. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 440–450. Google Scholar
Martell, R. F., & Leavitt, K. N. (2002). Reducing the performance-cue bias in work behavior ratings: Can groups help? Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1032–1041. Google Scholar
Mohammed, S., & Schwall, A. (2009). Individual differences and decision making: What we know and where we go from here. In Hodgkinson, G. P. & Ford, J. K. (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 249–312). Chichester, UK: John Wiley. Google Scholar
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker: Effort and accuracy in choice. In Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (Eds.), The adaptive decision maker (pp. 181–204). New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Reyna, V. F. (2008). Theories of medical decision making and health: An evidence-based approach. Medical Decision Making, 28, 829–833. Google Scholar
Sackett, P. R., & Lievens, F. (2008). Personnel selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 419–450. Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Noe, R. A., & Gottschalk, R. (1986). Using the lens model to magnify raters' consistency, matching, and shared bias. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 130–139. Google Scholar
Smither, J. W., London, M., & Reilly, R. R. (2005). Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 58, 33–66. Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (2009). What intelligence tests miss: The psychology of rational thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–726. Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 672–695. Google Scholar
Sterman, J. D. (1987). Testing behavioral simulation models by direct experiment. Management Science, 33, 1572–1592. Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458. Google Scholar