No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
I-O psychology’s top journals at the bottom of the TOP ranking: Should we consider openness and transparency when ranking journals?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 November 2020
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Commentaries
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
References
Banks, G. C., Field, J. G., Oswald, F. L., O’Boyle, E. H., Landis, R. S., Rupp, D. E., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2019). Answers to 18 questions about open science practices. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34, 257–270.10.1007/s10869-018-9547-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, N. E. (2011). The silent majority: Manuscript rejection and its impact on scholars. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10, 704–718.10.5465/amle.2010.0027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highhouse, S., Zickar, M. J., & Melick, S. R. (2020). Prestige and relevance of the scholarly journals: Impressions of SIOP members. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 13(3), 273–290.Google Scholar
Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., Buck, S., Chambers, C. D., Chin, G., Christensen, G., Contestabile, M., Dafoe, A., Eich, E., Freese, J., Glennerster, R., Goroff, D., Green, D. P., Hesse, B., Humphreys, J., … Yarkoni, T. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 26, 1422–1425.10.1126/science.aab2374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotton, J., Levitt, M., & Foos, P. (1993). Citation impact, rejection rates, and journal value. American Psychologist, 48,
911–912.10.1037/0003-066X.48.8.911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allow presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366.10.1177/0956797611417632CrossRefGoogle Scholar