Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:30:47.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I-O psychology’s top journals at the bottom of the TOP ranking: Should we consider openness and transparency when ranking journals?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2020

Deborah M. Powell Open the ORCID record for Deborah M. Powell [Opens in a new window] ,
Jeffrey R. Spence  and
David J. Stanley
Deborah M. Powell*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Jeffrey R. Spence
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
David J. Stanley
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 2020 , pp. 316 - 320
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banks, G. C., Field, J. G., Oswald, F. L., O’Boyle, E. H., Landis, R. S., Rupp, D. E., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2019). Answers to 18 questions about open science practices. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34, 257–270.10.1007/s10869-018-9547-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, N. E. (2011). The silent majority: Manuscript rejection and its impact on scholars. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10, 704–718.10.5465/amle.2010.0027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highhouse, S., Zickar, M. J., & Melick, S. R. (2020). Prestige and relevance of the scholarly journals: Impressions of SIOP members. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 13(3), 273–290.Google Scholar
Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., Buck, S., Chambers, C. D., Chin, G., Christensen, G., Contestabile, M., Dafoe, A., Eich, E., Freese, J., Glennerster, R., Goroff, D., Green, D. P., Hesse, B., Humphreys, J., … Yarkoni, T. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 26, 1422–1425.10.1126/science.aab2374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotton, J., Levitt, M., & Foos, P. (1993). Citation impact, rejection rates, and journal value. American Psychologist, 48, 911–912.10.1037/0003-066X.48.8.911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allow presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366.10.1177/0956797611417632CrossRefGoogle Scholar