Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T15:38:35.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integrating IOOB and JDM Through Process-Oriented Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Jochen Reb*
Affiliation:
Singapore Management University
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Singapore Management University, Lee Kong Chian School of Business, 50 Stamford Road, Singapore 178899.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1990). Image theory: A behavioral theory of decision making in organizations. In Staw, B. M. & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 141), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Dalal, R. S., Bonaccio, S., Highhouse, S., Ilgen, D. R., Mohammed, S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2010). What if industrial–organizational psychology decided to take workplace decisions seriously? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 386405.Google Scholar
Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Weiss, L., & Fireman, S. (1996). An empirical examination of the unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 536. Google Scholar
Raiffa, H. (2002). Negotiation analysis: The science and art of collaborative decision making. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. Google Scholar
Reb, J. (2008). Regret aversion and decision process quality: Effects of regret salience on decision process carefulness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105, 169182. Google Scholar
Reb, J., & Cropanzano, R. (2007). Evaluating dynamic performance: The influence of salient gestalt characteristics on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 490499. Google Scholar