Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:10:58.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrating discrimination training with CSR programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2020

Felix George Jr.
Felix George Jr.*
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 2020 , pp. 182 - 185
Copyright
© Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc. 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Charles, O. H. Jr., Schmidheiny, S., & Watts, P. (2017). Walking the talk: The business case for sustainable development. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cording, M., Harrison, J. S., Hoskisson, R. E., & Jonsen, K. (2014). Walking the talk: A multistakeholder exploration of organizational authenticity, employee productivity, and post-merger performance. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28, 38–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donia, M. B. L., Sirsly, T. C. A., & Ronen, S. (2017). Employee attributions of corporate social responsibility as substantive or symbolic: Validation of a measure. Applied Psychology, 66, 103–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryzel, B., & Seppala, N. (2016). The effect of CSR evaluations on affective attachment to CSR in different identity orientation firms. Business Ethics: A European Review, 25, 310–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groza, M. D., Pronschinske, M. R., & Walker, M. (2011). Perceived organizational motives and consumer responses to proactive and reactive CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 102, 639–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, T., Kaylor, H., & Oltman, K. (2020). Coffee and controversy: How applied psychology can revitalize sexual harassment and racial discrimination training. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 13(2), XXX–XXX.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, K., Hattrup, K., Spiess, S. O., & Lin-Hi, N. (2012). The effects of corporate social responsibility on employees’ affective commitment: A cross-cultural investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1186–1200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rego, A., Leal, S., Cunha, M. P., Faria, J., & Pinho, C. (2010). How the perceptions of five dimensions of corporate citizenship and their inter-inconsistencies predict affective commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schons, L., & Steinmeier, M. (2016). Walk the talk? How symbolic and substantive CSR actions affect firm performance depending on stakeholder proximity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23, 358–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, I., Hur, W. M., Kim, M., & Kang, S. (2017). Hidden roles of CSR: Perceived corporate social responsibility as a preventive against counterproductive work behaviors. Sustainability, 9, 955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamagishi, T., & Cook, K. S. (1993). Generalized exchange and social dilemmas. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar