Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:40:35.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Innovative Ideas on How Work–Family Research Can Have More Impact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Ellen Ernst Kossek ,
Boris B. Baltes  and
Russell A. Matthews
Ellen Ernst Kossek*
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Boris B. Baltes
Affiliation:
Wayne State University
Russell A. Matthews
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: School of Human Resources and Labor Relations, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The commentaries on our focal article agreed with its main premise that work–family research should follow new strategies to improve its practical impact, and made suggestions clustering into three main themes. The first theme built on our suggestion to improve the research focus, terminology, and framing of work-family research. These essays offered additional ideas such as decoupling work-family from work-life research, and examining contextual factors more deeply. The second theme focused on how to better apply the findings from work family research. These commentaries provided social change approaches for making work-family issues more central to key stakeholders and to organizations. The third theme focused on broadening our scope to the societal level. These editorials advocated tactics supporting the development of basic rights of work–life balance within and across nations.

Type
Response
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 426 - 432
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agars, M. D., & French, K. A. (2011). What if work and family research actually considered workers and their families? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 375–378. Google Scholar
Aumann, K., & Galinsky, E. (2011). Creating a high impact work–family research agenda. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 393–397. Google Scholar
Cunningham, C. J. L. (2011). How interrole conflict research can have a greater impact. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 370–374. Google Scholar
Deuling, J. K., & Mallard, A. (2011). Work–nonwork research: Moving toward a scientist–practitioner collaboration. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 406–409. Google Scholar
Emmons, R. A., & King, L. A. (1988). Conflict among personal strivings: Immediate and long-term implications for psychological and physical well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1040–1048. Google Scholar
Grawitch, M. J., Maloney, P. W., Barber, L. K., & Yost, C. (2011). Moving toward a better understanding of the work and nonwork interface. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 385–388. Google Scholar
Gerdes, L. (2009). Bad economy hasn't changed Gen Y's desire for work/life balance [Web log message]. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/managing/blogs/first_jobs/archives/2009/09/bad_economy_has.html.Google Scholar
Huffman, A. H., Sanders, A. M., & Culbertson, S. S. (2011). Work–family research has a public relations problem: Moving from organizational nicety to necessity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 410–413. Google Scholar
Huffman, A. H., Youngcourt, S. S., Payne, S. C., & Castro, C. A. (2008). The importance of construct breadth when examining inter-role conflict. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 515–530. Google Scholar
Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., Dumani, S., Cho, E., & Allen, T. D. (2011). Work–family research: A broader view of impact. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 389–392. Google Scholar
Kossek, E. E., 1987. Human resource management innovation. Human Resource Management Journal, 6, 71–92. Google Scholar
Kossek, E. E., 1989. The acceptance of human resources innovation by multiple constituencies. Personnel Psychology, 42, 263–281. Google Scholar
Las Heras, M., & Grau, M. (2011). Having an impact: Learning from those who have done it. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 422–425. Google Scholar
Leslie, L. M., & Manchester, C. F. (2011). Work–family conflict is a social issue not a women's issue. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 414–417. Google Scholar
Major, D. A., & Morganson, V. J. (2011). Applying I–O psychology to help organizations and individuals balance work and family. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 398–401. Google Scholar
Matthews, R. A., Booth, S. M., Taylor, C. F., & Martin, T. (2011). A qualitative examination of the work–family interface: Parents of children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Vocational Behavior. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.04.010.Google Scholar
Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2011). Building a citizenship argument on top of the business case argument: A systemic perspective on work–family articulation. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 418–421. Google Scholar
Repetti, R. L., & Saxbe, D. (2009). The effects of job stress on the family: One size does not fit all. In Crane, D. R. & Hill, E. J. (Eds.), Handbook of family and work: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 62–78). Lanham, MD: University Press of America. Google Scholar
Rothausen, T. J. (2011). Unpacking work–family: Core overarching but underidentified issues. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 379–384. Google Scholar
Wells, K. (2011). More research with a purpose: Advancing the work–family program utilization. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 402–405. Google Scholar