Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-fnl2l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-11T05:19:40.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Increasing the saliency of ethical decision making for SIOP members

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

Elizabeth L. Shoenfelt ,
Janet L. Kottke Open the ORCID record for Janet L. Kottke [Opens in a new window]  and
Nancy J. Stone Open the ORCID record for Nancy J. Stone [Opens in a new window]
Elizabeth L. Shoenfelt*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Sciences, Western Kentucky University
Janet L. Kottke
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, California State University, San Bernardino
Nancy J. Stone
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Science, Missouri University of Science and Technology
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 2022 , pp. 241 - 245
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

American Psychological Association. (2016). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of ethics. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code Google Scholar
American Psychological Association. (2021). Complaints regarding APA members. https://www.apa.org/ethics/complaint Google Scholar
Banks, G. C., Knapp, D. J., Lin, L., Sanders, C. S., & Grant, J. A. (2022). Ethical decision making in the 21st century: A useful framework for industrial-organizational psychologists. Industrial-Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 15(2), 220–235.Google Scholar
Brossoit, R. M., Wong, J. R., Robles-Saenz, F., Barber, L. K., Allen, T. D., & Britt, T. D. (2021). Is that ethical? The current state of industrial-organizational psychology graduate training in ethics. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 58(3). https://www.siop.org/Research-Publications/Items-of-Interest/ArtMID/19366/ArticleID/4888 Google Scholar
Hauser, C. (2019). Fighting against corruption: Does anti-corruption training make any difference? Journal of Business Ethics, 159(1), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3808-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395. https://doi.org/10.2307/258867 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017103 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lefkowitz, J. (2005). The values of industrial-organizational psychology: Who are we? The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 43(2), 13–20.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2008). To prosper, organizational psychology should … expand its values to match the quality of its ethics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 439–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2021). Forms of ethical dilemmas in industrial-organizational psychology. Industrial-Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 14(3), 297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, J., & Watts, L. L. (2021). Ethical incidents reported by industrial-organizational psychologists: A ten-year follow-up. Journal of Applied Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000946 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sashkin, M. & Prien, E. P. (1996). Ethical concerns and organizational surveys. In Kraut, A. I. (Ed.), Organizational surveys: Tools for assessment and change (pp. 381–403). Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Shoenfelt, E. L., Kottke, J. L., & Stone, N. J. (2012). Master’s and undergraduate I/O internships: Data-based recommendations for successful experiences. Teaching of Psychology, 39(2), 100–106. doi: 10.1177/0098628312437724 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc. (2020). Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology anti-harassment policy. https://www.siop.org/Portals/84/2020%20Governance%20Updates/SIOP%20Anti-Harassment%20Policy%20April%202020.pdf?ver=2020-04-30-164045-983 Google Scholar
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Committee for the Advancement of Professional Ethics (2022). https://www.siop.org/Career-Center/Professional-Ethics Google Scholar
Stone, N. J., Kottke, J. L., & Shoenfelt, E. L. (2021). Ethics and I-O psychology: Do we just talk the talk or do we walk the walk? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 14(3), 335–339. doi: 10.1017/iop.2021.66 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, L. L., Medeiros, K. E., Mulhearn, T. J., Steele, L. M., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. D. (2017). Are ethics training programs improving? A meta-analytic review of past and present ethics instruction in the sciences. Ethics & Behavior, 27(5), 351–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2016.1182025 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zelin, A., Lider, M., & Doverspike, D. (2015, December). SIOP career study executive report. Center for Organizational Research, The University of Akron. https://www.siop.org/Portals/84/PDFs/Professionals/SIOP_Careers_Study_Executive_Report_FINAL-Revised_031116.pdf?ver=2019-06-26-075622-550 Google Scholar