Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:31:36.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Identifying the Ethical (Unethical) Undercurrent of Identified Surveys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Justina M. Froelich
Justina M. Froelich*
Affiliation:
Baruch College, City University of New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 476 - 478
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author thanks Joel Lefkowitz for his constructive feedback and comments.

References

American Psychological Association (APA). (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2003). Ethics and values in industrial–organizational psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
Saari, L. M., & Scherbaum, C. A. (2011). Identified employee surveys: Potential promise, perils, and professional practice guidelines. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 435–448.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01369.xGoogle Scholar