Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T06:50:33.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Houston, We Do Have a Problem!”: Why Should Industrial–Organizational Psychologists Be Pulled by Psychology Departments?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Zeynep Aycan*
Affiliation:
Koç University
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Department of Psychology & Department of Management, Koç University, Turkey

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguinis, H., Bradley, K. J., & Brodersen, A. (2014). Industrial–organizational psychologists in business schools: Brain drain or eye opener? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7(3), 284303.Google Scholar
Barrett, L. F. (2009). The future of psychology: Connecting mind to brain. Perspectives on Psychological Sciences, 4(4), 326339.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T. (2013). Psychological sciences in the 21st century. Teaching of Psychology, 16.Google Scholar
Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.) (2000). Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Losin, E. A. R., Dapretto, M., & Iacoboni, M. (2010). Culture and neuroscience: Additive or synergistic. Scan, 5, 148158.Google ScholarPubMed