Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:25:17.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Getting in the game: I-O psychologists as debunkers and testers of business practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2019

Sayeedul Islam  and
Gordon B. Schmidt Open the ORCID record for Gordon B. Schmidt [Opens in a new window]
Sayeedul Islam*
Affiliation:
Talent Metrics Farmingdale State College
Gordon B. Schmidt
Affiliation:
Purdue University Fort Wayne
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 2019 , pp. 243 - 246
Copyright
© Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamson, E. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21, 254–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychological Association. (2019). Industrial organizational psychology. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/ed/graduate/specialize/industrialGoogle Scholar
Balzer, W. K., Brodke, M. H., Kluse, C., & Zickar, M. J. (2019). Revolution or 30-year fad? A role for I-O psychology in Lean management. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12(3), 215–233.Google Scholar
Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., & Erdogan, B. (2015). Psychology and work: Perspectives on industrial and organizational psychology. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cucina, J. M., & McDaniel, M. A. (2016). Pseudotheory proliferation is damaging the organizational sciences. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(8), 1116–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunnette, M. D. (1966). Fads, fashion and folderol in psychology. American Psychologist, 21, 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, B. D., Watkins, A. M. F., McAbee, S. T., Faura, L., Wallace, C., Zugec, L., & Poteet, M. L. (2017). The bridge: Connecting science and practice: The case for using working memory in practice. The Industrial Organizational Psychologist, 55(1). Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/Research-Publications/TIP/TIP-Back-Issues/2017/July/ArtMID/20297/ArticleID/1576/The-Bridge-Connecting-Science-and-PracticeThe-Case-for-Using-Working-Memory-in-PracticeGoogle Scholar
Gasser, M., Butler, A., Waddilove, L., & Tan, R. (2004). Defining the profession of industrial-organizational psychology. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 42(2), 15–20.Google Scholar
Gasser, M., Walsh, B., & Butler, A. (2008). The industrial-organizational psychology curriculum: Is what we teach valued by business? The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 46(1), 37–42.Google Scholar
Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (2002). The dynamics of organizational identity. Human Relations, 55, 989–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/industrial-and-organizational-psychologyGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2010). Industrial-organizational psychology’s recurring identity crises: It’s a values issue! Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3(3), 293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz, J. (2013). Values of I-O psychology, another example: What and whom we don’t study and what it all suggests about the profession. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 51(2), 46–56.Google Scholar
Nolan, K. P., Islam, S., & Quartarone, M. (2014). The influence of vocational training on the brand images of organizational consultants. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 17(4), 245–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ones, D. S., Kaiser, R. B., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Svensson, C. (2017). Has industrial-organizational psychology lost its way? The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 7(2), 136. Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/Research-Publications/Items-of-Interest/ArtMID/19366/ArticleID/1550/Has-Industrial-Organizational-Psychology-Lost-Its-WayGoogle Scholar
Ryan, A. M. (2003). Defining ourselves: I-O psychology’s identity quest. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 41(1), 21–33.Google Scholar
Ryan, A. M., & Ford, K. J. (2010). Organizational psychology and the tipping point of professional identity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3(3), 241–258.Google Scholar
Spector, P. E. (2017). The lost art of discovery: The case for inductive methods in occupational health science and the broader organizational sciences. Occupational Health Science, 1(1–2), 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar