Hostname: page-component-669899f699-b58lm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T17:46:19.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The future of work and learning hinges on social and relational processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2025

Rebecca Storey Open the ORCID record for Rebecca Storey [Opens in a new window] ,
Sibley F. Lyndgaard Open the ORCID record for Sibley F. Lyndgaard [Opens in a new window]  and
Ruth Kanfer Open the ORCID record for Ruth Kanfer [Opens in a new window]
Rebecca Storey*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA
Sibley F. Lyndgaard
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA
Ruth Kanfer
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA
*
Corresponding author: Rebecca Storey; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 2025 , pp. 128 - 133
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beier, M. E., Saxena, M., Kraiger, K., Costanza, D. P., Rudolph, C. W., Cadiz, D. M., Petery, G., & Fisher, G. G. (2025). Workplace learning and the future of work. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 18, 84–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2024.57 Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clow, D. (2013). An overview of learning analytics. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(6), 683–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.827653 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, G. (2000). Lifelong learning–more than training. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(3), 265–294.Google Scholar
Goodwin, K. (2019). Developing self-efficacy and career optimism through participation in communities of practice within Australian creative industries. Australian Journal of Career Development, 28(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038416219849644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammer, L. B., Grigsby, T. D., & Woods, S. (1998). The conflicting demands of work, family, and school among students at an urban university. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 132(2), 220–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989809599161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (2004). Aging, adult development, and work motivation. The Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 440–458. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, P. E., Chyung, S. Y., Winiecki, D. J., & Brinkerhoff, R. O. (2013). Training professionals’ usage and understanding of Kirkpatrick’s level 3 and level 4 evaluations. International Journal of Training and Development, 18(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, S. (1975). On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Journal, 18(4), 769–783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lipton, K. (2023, September 29). Does your hybrid culture really work for everyone? Gallup. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/511553/hybrid-culture-really-work-everyone.aspx.Google Scholar
Lyndgaard, S. F., Storey, R., & Kanfer, R. (2024). Technological support for lifelong learning: The application of a multilevel, person-centric framework. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 153(104027). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2024.104027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, T. J. (2001). Career-relevant learning and development, worker age, and beliefs about self-efficacy for development. Journal of Management, 27(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(00)00092-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, C. G. (2018). Coactive vicarious learning: Toward a relational theory of vicarious learning in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 43(4), 610–634. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, C. W., Katz, I. M., Lavigne, K. N., & Zacher, H. (2017). Job crafting: A meta-analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 112–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.05.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In Staw, B. M., & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (Vol. 18, pp. 1–74). Elsevier Science/JAI Press.Google Scholar
Wigert, B., Harter, J., & Agrawal, S. (2023, October 9). The future of the office has arrived: It’s hybrid. Gallup. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/511994/future-office-arrived-hybrid.aspx Google Scholar
Yoon, S. A., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2017). What do learning scientists do? A survey of the ISLS membership. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(2), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1279546 CrossRefGoogle Scholar