Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:36:48.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further “Tempering Hard Times”: Integrating Integrity Metrics Into Utility Analyses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2015

Saul Fine
Saul Fine*
Affiliation:
Midot, Ltd.
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Midot, Ltd., 11 Ben Gurion St, Vita Towers, Bnei Brak 51260, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 576 - 579
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Center for Retail Research (2010). The global retail theft barometer 2010. Nottingham, England: Author.Google Scholar
Fine, S. (2010). Pre-employment integrity testing across multiple job industries. Psychological Reports, 107(2), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fine, S. (2012). Estimating the economic impact of personnel selection tools on counterproductive work behaviors. Economics and Business Letters, 1(4), 1–9.Google Scholar
Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. (2009). Average wages per employee job of Israeli workers, July-September 2009. Retrieved from http://www.cbs.gov.ilGoogle Scholar
Karren, R. J., & Zacharias, L. (2007). Integrity tests: Critical issues. Human Resource Management Review, 17, 221–234.Google Scholar
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2009). To lead, create a shared vision. Harvard Business Review, 87, 20–21.Google Scholar
Latham, G. P., & Whyte, G. (1994). The futility of utility analysis. Personnel Psychology, 47, 31–46.Google Scholar
Murphy, K. R. (1993). Honesty in the workplace. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
O'Boyle, E., & Aguinis, H. (2012). The best and the rest: Revisiting the norm of normality of individual performance. Personnel Psychology, 65, 79–119.Google Scholar
Sackett, P. R., & Devore, C. J. (2001). Counterproductive behaviors at work. In Anderson, N., Ones, D. S., Sinangil, H. K., & Viswesvaran, C. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 145–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1983). Individual differences in productivity: An empirical test of estimates derived from studies of selection procedure utility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(3), 407–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., McKenzie, R. C., & Muldrow, T. W. (1979). Impact of valid selection procedures on work-force productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(6), 609–626.Google Scholar
Tziner, A., & Birati, A. (2002). Assessing the financial value of worker organizational behaviors and human resource management programs and interventions. In Tziner, A. (Ed.), Human resource management and organization behavior (pp. 321–367). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Tziner, A., Fein, E. C., & Birati, A. (2014). Tempering hard times: Integrating well-being metrics into utility analysis. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7(4), 554–568.Google Scholar