Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-vmclg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-23T17:34:59.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating online I-O graduate programs: An information-seeking guide for prospective students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

Thomas B. Ayres Open the ORCID record for Thomas B. Ayres [Opens in a new window]  and
Seth A. Osborn
Thomas B. Ayres*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Sociology, Park University
Seth A. Osborn
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The University of Tulsa
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 2022 , pp. 172 - 176
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to thank the reviewers for their feedback that contributed to improving this commentary.

References

Kraiger, K., Fisher, S., Grossman, R., Mills, M. J., & Sitzmann, T. (2022). Online I-O graduate education: Where are we and where should we go? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 15(2), 151–171.Google Scholar
Tett, R. P., Brummel, B., Simonet, D. V., & Rothstein, M. (2014). Making an informed choice of industrial–organizational versus organizational behavior as a PhD student (and a professor). Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7(3), 336–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar