Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T12:33:59.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Employee Engagement From a Self-Determination Theory Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

John P. Meyer  and
Maryléne Gagnè
John P. Meyer*
Affiliation:
The University of Western Ontario
Maryléne Gagnè
Affiliation:
Concordia University
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 60 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario

**

Department of Management, John Molson School of Business, Concordia University

References

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7Google Scholar
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362.10.1002/job.322Google Scholar
Koestner, R., & Losier, G. (1996). Distinguishing reactive versus reflective autonomy. Journal of Personality, 64, 465–494.10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00518.xGoogle Scholar
Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 3–30.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.xGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E., & Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Employee commitment and motivation: A conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 991–1007.10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.991Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761.10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68Google Scholar
Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 600–619.10.1108/02683940610690169Google Scholar
Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need-satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 482–497.10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.482Google Scholar
Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 271–360). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Vallerand, R. J., Blanchard, C., Mageau, G. A., Koestner, R., Ratelle, C., Léonard, M. et al. (2003). Les passions de l’âme: On obsessive and harmonious passion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 756–767.10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.756Google Scholar