Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:57:33.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Policy Change on Nonstigmatized Employees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Kevin J. Eschleman  and
Martin P. Gooden
Kevin J. Eschleman*
Affiliation:
Wright State University
Martin P. Gooden
Affiliation:
Wright State University
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Department of Psychology, Wright State University, 3640 Colonel Glenn Highway, Dayton, OH 45435-0001
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 93 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Psychology, Wright State University.

References

Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B., Von Hippel, W., & Gooden, M. P. (1999). Diversity and organizational identity: The problem of entrée after entry. In Prentice, D. A. & Miller, D. T. (Eds.), Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 337–363). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Crandall, C. S., Eshleman, A., & O’Brien, L. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359–378.10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.359Google Scholar
Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egotistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85–113.10.1037/0033-295X.83.2.85Google Scholar
Davis, M. H. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark Publishers.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Isen, A. M., & Lowrance, R. (1995). Group representations and intergroup bias: Positive affect, similarity, and group size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 856–865.10.1177/0146167295218009Google Scholar
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. In Stroabe, W. & Hewstone, M. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1–26). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.Google Scholar
Herek, G. M. (2009). Sexual prejudice. In Nelson, T. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 441–467). New York: Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
Hewstone, M., Islam, M. R., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Models of crossed categorization and intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 779–793.Google Scholar
James, E. H., Brief, A. P., Dietz, J., & Cohen, R. R. (2001). Prejudice matters: Understanding the reactions of whites to affirmative action programs targeted to benefit blacks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1120–1128.10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1120Google Scholar
Johnson, M. E., Brems, C., & Alfor-Keating, P. (1997). Personality correlates of homophobia. Journal of Homosexuality, 34, 57–69.10.1300/J082v34n01_05Google Scholar
King, E. B., & Cortina, J. (2010). The social and economic imperative of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered supportive organizational policies. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 69–78.Google Scholar
Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., Milne, A. B., & Jetten, J. (1994). Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 808–817.10.1037/0022-3514.67.5.808Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65Google Scholar
Plant, A. E. (2004). Responses to interracial interactions over time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1458–1471.10.1177/0146167204264244Google Scholar
Rokeach, M. (2003). Long-range experimental modification of values, attitudes, and behavior. In Plous, S. (Ed.), Understanding prejudice and discrimination (pp. 474–480). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Stephan, W. G., & Finlay, K. (2003). The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations. In Plous, S. (Ed.), Understanding prejudice and discrimination (pp. 481–490). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D. J., Carter, S. R. III, & White, T. L. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 5–13.Google Scholar
Wenzel, M., Mummendey, A., Weber, U., & Waldzus, S. (2003). The ingroup as pars pro toto: Projection from the ingroup onto the inclusive category as a precursor to social discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 461–473.Google Scholar