Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:17:56.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Content Validity and Murphy's Angst

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Irwin L. Goldstein  and
Sheldon Zedeck
Irwin L. Goldstein*
Affiliation:
University System of Maryland
Sheldon Zedeck
Affiliation:
University of California
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: University System of Maryland, 3300 Metzerott Road, Adelphi, MD 20783
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 496
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Psychology, University of California

References

Goldstein, I. L., Zedeck, S., & Schneider, B. (1993). An exploration of the job analysis—Content validity process. In Schmitt, N. & Borman, W. C. (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations. (pp. 3–34) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Murphy, K. R. (2009). Content validation is useful for many things, but validity isn't one of them. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2, 454–464.Google Scholar
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc. (2003). Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures (4th ed.). Bowling Green, OH: Author.Google Scholar