Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:41:09.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Constructs versus measures in personality and other domains: What distinguishes normal and clinical?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2019

Brenton M. Wiernik*
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
Marina A. Bornovalova
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
Stephen E. Stark
Affiliation:
University of South Florida
Deniz S. Ones
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
© Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrick, M. R., Shaffer, J. A., & DeGrassi, S. W. (2009). What you see may not be what you get: Relationships among self-presentation tactics and ratings of interview and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 13941411. https://doi.org/10/cwc7mj CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, K., Wood-Dauphine, S., Williams, J. I., & Gayton, D. (2009). Measuring balance in the elderly: Preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada, 41(6), 304311. https://doi.org/10/dc8nr8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, R. P. (2012). mirt: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(6), 129. https://doi.org/10/gckfrg CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloninger, C. R. (1987). A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants: A proposal. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44(6), 573588. https://doi.org/10/frm495 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Professional manual for the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) [Technical manual]. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Derogatis, L. R., & Melisaratos, N. (1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13(3), 595605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilchert, S., Ones, D. S., & Krueger, R. F. (2014). Maladaptive personality constructs, measures, and work behaviors. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7(1), 98110. https://doi.org/10/gckfs5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J., Jackson, H. J., & Pattison, P. E. (2002). Emotion recognition via facial expression and affective prosody in schizophrenia: A methodological review. Clinical Psychology Review, 22(6), 789832. https://doi.org/10/fj6g2v CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (EEOC). (2000). Enforcement guidance on disability-related inquiries and medical examinations of employees under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (Notice No. 915.002). Retrieved from https://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/guidance-inquiries.html Google Scholar
El Fassi, M., Bocquet, V., Majery, N., Lair, M. L., Couffignal, S., & Mairiaux, P. (2013). Work ability assessment in a worker population: Comparison and determinants of Work Ability Index and Work Ability score. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 305. https://doi.org/10/gbc2jj CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
First, M. B., Williams, J. B. W., Karg, R. S., & Spitzer, R. L. (2016). Structured clinical interview for DSM-5 disorders: Clinician version (SCID-5-CV). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Gibby, R. E., & Zickar, M. J. (2008). A history of the early days of personality testing in American industry: An obsession with adjustment. History of Psychology, 11(3), 164184. https://doi.org/10/dzk7ss CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grazioplene, R. G., Chavez, R. S., Rustichini, A., & DeYoung, C. G. (2016). White matter correlates of psychosis-linked traits support continuity between personality and psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(8), 11351145. https://doi.org/10/f9bvhc CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, C. C. (1999). Generalizing physical ability test validity: A case study using test transportability validity generalization and construct-related validation evidence. Personnel Psychology, 52, 10191041.Google Scholar
John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In John, O. P., Robins, R. W., and Pervin, L. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kongs, S. K., Thompson, L. L., Iverson, G. L., & Heaton, R. K. (2000). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test-64 card version (WCST-64) [Technical manual]. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F., Hicks, B. M., Patrick, C. J., Carlson, S. R., Iacono, W. G., & McGue, M. (2002). Etiologic connections among substance dependence, antisocial behavior and personality: Modeling the externalizing spectrum. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111(3), 411424. https://doi.org/10/czm9gg CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuzmits, F. E., & Adams, A. J. (2008). The NFL combine: Does it predict performance in the National Football League? Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 22(6), 17211727. https://doi.org/10/c9p88h CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, D., Marziali, E., & Hood, J. (1997). Emotion processing in borderline personality disorders. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 185(4), 240246. https://doi.org/10/fnshk3 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. C., … Rutter, M. (2000). The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule—Generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(3), 205223. https://doi.org/10/c3gpcq CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markon, K. E., Krueger, R. F., & Watson, D. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 139157. https://doi.org/10/dprbt5 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGrew, K. S., LaForte, E. M., & Schrank, F. A. (2014). Woodcock-Johnson IV [technical manual]. Retrieved from https://www.wjscore.com/Files/WJIVTechnicalManual.PDF Google Scholar
McLean, A., Dowson, J., Toone, B., Young, S., Bazanis, E., Robbins, T. W., & Sahakian, B. J. (2004). Characteristic neurocognitive profile associated with adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychological Medicine, 34(4), 681692. https://doi.org/10/cqrc33 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melson-Silimon, A., Harris, A. M., Shoenfelt, E. L., Miller, J. D., & Carter, N. T. (2019). Personality testing and the Americans with Disabilities Act: Cause for concern as normal and abnormal personality models are integrated. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12(2), 119132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mickes, L., Wixted, J. T., Fennema-Notestine, C., Galasko, D., Bondi, M. W., Thal, L. J., & Salmon, D. P. (2007). Progressive impairment on neuropsychological tasks in a longitudinal study of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 21(6), 696705. https://doi.org/10/dzjsw9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pace, V. L., & Brannick, M. T. (2010). How similar are personality scales of the “same” construct? A meta-analytic investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(7), 669676. https://doi.org/10/ccjmkm CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/ Google Scholar
Raymark, P. H., Schmit, M. J., & Guion, R. M. (1997). Identifying potentially useful personality constructs for employee selection. Personnel Psychology, 50(3), 723736. https://doi.org/10/bzvv5t CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatz, P., Pardini, J. E., Lovell, M. R., Collins, M. W., & Podell, K. (2006 ). Sensitivity and specificity of the ImPACT Test Battery for concussion in athletes. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21(1), 9199. https://doi.org/10/ctz8f2 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanek, K. C., & Ones, D. S. (2018). Taxonomies and compendia of cognitive ability and personality measures relevant to industrial, work, and organizational psychology. In Ones, D. S., Anderson, N., Viswesvaran, C., and Sinangil, H. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 366407). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473914940.n14 Google Scholar
Stanek, K. C., Ones, D. S., & McGue, M. (2017). Counterproductive behaviors: Relations across life domains, etiology, and implications for applied practice. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 25(2), 111124. https://doi.org/10/gckf9r CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tellegen, A. (1990). Manual for the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2018). Non-test methods and techniques used in employee selection. In Ones, D. S., Anderson, N., Viswesvaran, C., and Sinangil, H. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 451473). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473914940.n16 Google Scholar