Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:59:42.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The challenges of Lean management research and practice in the field of entrepreneurship: The roles of I-O psychology theories and I-O psychologists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2019

Chao Miao ,
Shanshan Qian  and
Ronald H. Humphrey
Chao Miao*
Affiliation:
Salisbury University
Shanshan Qian
Affiliation:
Towson University
Ronald H. Humphrey
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 2019 , pp. 260 - 263
Copyright
© Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balzer, W. K., Brodke, M. H., Kluse, C., & Zickar, M. J. (2019). Revolution or 30-year fad? A role for I-O psychology in Lean management. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12(3), 215–233.Google Scholar
Banks, G. C., Pollack, J. M., Bochantin, J. E., Kirkman, B. L., Whelpley, C. E., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2016). Management’s science–practice gap: A grand challenge for all stakeholders. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 2205–2231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006/2007). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blank, S. (2013). Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Business Review, 91, 63–72.Google Scholar
Blank, S. G., & Dorf, B. (2012). The startup owner’s manual: The step-by-step guide for building a great company. Pescadero, CA: K&S Ranch Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Frese, M., & Gielnik, M. M. (2014). The psychology of entrepreneurship. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 413–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghezzi, A., & Cavallo, A. (In press). Agile business model innovation in digital entrepreneurship: Lean startup approaches. Journal of Business Research. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.013Google Scholar
Hoffman, B. J., Woehr, D. J., Maldagen-Youngjohn, R., & Lyons, B. D. (2011). Great man or great myth? A quantitative review of the relationship between individual differences and leader effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84, 347–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, N., Barrick, M. R., Zimmerman, R. D., & Chiaburu, D. S. (2014). Retaining the productive employee: The role of personality. Academy of Management Annals, 8, 347–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansoori, Y., & Lackéus, M. (In press). Comparing effectuation to discovery-driven planning, prescriptive entrepreneurship, business planning, lean startup, and design thinking. Small Business Economics. doi:10.1007/s11187-019-00153-wGoogle Scholar
Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York, NY: Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C., & Van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar