Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T10:41:33.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Causes and Consequences of a Scientific Literature We Cannot Trust: An Evidence-Based Practice Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Rob B. Briner*
Affiliation:
University of Bath
Neil D. Walshe
Affiliation:
University of San Francisco
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: School of Management, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Briner, R. B., Denyer, D., & Rousseau, D. M. (2009). Evidence-based management: Concept cleanup time? Academy of Management Perspectives, 23, 1932.Google Scholar
Briner, R. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (2011). Evidence-based I–O psychology: Not there yet. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kepes, S., & McDaniel, M. A. (2013). How trustworthy is the scientific literature in I-O psychology? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6(3), 252268.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2006). Hard facts, dangerous half-truths, and total nonsense: Profiting from evidence-based management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M. (2006). Is there such a thing as evidence-based management? Academy of Management Review, 31, 256269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. (1991). Where is the wisdom…? British Medical Journal, 303(6806), 798799.Google Scholar