No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The business of cybervetting
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 September 2022
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Commentaries
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology
References
Cook, W., & Kuhn, K. M. (2021). Off-duty deviance in the eye of the beholder: Implications of moral foundations theory in the age of social media. Journal of Business Ethics, 172(3), 605–620.Google Scholar
Gershman, J. (2017, July 27, B1). LinkedIn case tests whether firms can use your data. Wall Street Journal.Google Scholar
Egg, Good. (2022). Social media background checks. https://www.goodegg.io/social-media-screening
Google Scholar
Hoerner, E., & Tulsky, R. (2019). Cops around the country are posting racist and violent comments on Facebook. Injustice Watch. https://www.injusticewatch.org/interactives/cops-troubling-facebook-posts-revealed/
Google Scholar
Heilweil, R. (2020, May 11). Beware these futuristic background checks. Vox/Recode. www.vox.com/recode/2020/5/11/21166291/artificial-intelligence-ai-background-check-checkr-fama
Google Scholar
Kuhn, K. M. (2019). Is it disqualifying? Practitioner responses to criminal offenses in hiring decisions. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 38(5), 547–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vestal, S. (2019, February 8). Cursory Google search would have caught red flags in Spokane school resource officer hire. The Spokesman-Review.Google Scholar
Wilcox, A., Damarin, A. K., & McDonald, S. (2022). Is cybervetting valuable? Industrial Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 15(3), 315–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar