Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:17:05.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Building a Citizenship Argument on Top of the Business Case Argument: A Systemic Perspective on Work–Family Articulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Ariane Ollier-Malaterre
Ariane Ollier-Malaterre*
Affiliation:
Rouen Business School
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Management and Strategy Department, Rouen Business School, 1 rue du Maréchal Juin, BP 215, 76825 Mont Saint Aignan Cedex, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 418 - 421
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Googins, B. (1994). Redefining the social contract. In Heuberger, F. & Nash, L. (Eds.), A fatal embrace? Assessing holistic trends in human resources programs (pp. 199–212). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. Google Scholar
Greenhaus, J., & Allen, T. (2011). Work–family balance: A review and extension of the literature. In Quick, J. C. & Tetrick, L. E. (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (2nd ed., pp. 165–183). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar
Hochschild, A. R. (2004). Love and gold. In Ehrenreich, B. & Hochschild, A. R. (Eds.), Global woman: Nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy (pp. 15–30). New York, NY: Metropolitan Books. Google Scholar
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Work and family in the United States: A critical review and agenda for research and policy. New York, NY: Sage. Google Scholar
Kossek, E. E., Baltes, B. B., & Matthews, R. A. (2011). How work–family research can finally have an impact in organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 352–369.Google Scholar
Kossek, E., & Van Dyne, L. (2008). Face time matters: A cross level model of how work life flexibility influences work performance of individuals and groups. In Lero, D., Korabik, K., & Whitehead, D. (Eds.), Work family handbook (pp. 305–330). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. Google Scholar
Maurice, M., & Sellier, F. (1979). Societal analysis of industrial relations: A comparison between France and West Germany. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 17, 322–336. Google Scholar
Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2009). Organizational work–life initiatives: Context matters. France compared to the U.K. and the U.S. Community, Work and Family, 12, 159–178. Google Scholar
Rex Flexibility (2011). The Dutch have daddy days—why not us? Retrieved from http://wfnetwork.bc.edu/blog/the-dutch-have-daddy-days-why-not-us.Google Scholar
Rynes, S. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (2005). Public policy and the public interest: What if we mattered more? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 925–927.Google Scholar
Wisnia-Weill, V. (2010). La “grand-parentalité active”, Note d’analyse n° 199. Paris: Centre d’analyse stratégique. Google Scholar