Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:29:54.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Big data opportunities for advancing turnover theory: A case for inductive and abductive research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2019

Sang Eun Woo
Sang Eun Woo*
Affiliation:
Purdue University
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 2019 , pp. 330 - 333
Copyright
© Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gardner, T. M., Van Iddekinge, C. H., & Hom, P. W. (2018). If you’ve got leavin’ on your mind: The identification and validation of pre-quitting behaviors. Journal of Management, 44(8), 3231–3257. doi: 10.1177/0149206316665462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, D. A., & Newman, D. A. (2013). Absence, lateness, turnover, and retirement: Narrow and broad understandings of withdrawal and behavioral engagement. In Weiner, I., Schmitt, N. W., & Highhouse, S. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 12, 2nd ed. (pp. 262–291). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Klotz, A. C., & Bolino, M. C. (2016). Saying goodbye: The nature, causes, and consequences of employee resignation styles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(10), 1386–1404. doi: 10.1037/apl0000135CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, T. W., Hom, P. W., Eberly, M. B., & Mitchell, T. R. (2017). On the next decade of research in voluntary employee turnover. Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(3), 201–221. doi: 10.5465/amp.2016.0123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, T. R., Burch, T. C., & Lee, T. W. (2014). The need to consider time, level, and trends: A turnover perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(2), 296–300. doi: 10.1002/job.1898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosse, J. G., & Miller, H. E. (1984). Relationship between absenteeism and other employee behaviors. In Goodman, P. S. & Atkin, R. S. (Eds.), Absenteeism: New approaches to understanding, measuring, and managing employee absence (pp. 194–228). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Speer, A. B., Dutta, S., Chen, M., & Trussell, G. (2019). Here to stay or go? Connecting turnover research to applied attrition modeling. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12(3), 272–296.Google Scholar
Woo, S. E., & Allen, D. G. (2014). Toward an inductive theory of stayers and seekers in the organization. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(4), 683–703. doi: 10.1007/s10869-013-9303-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woo, S. E., O’Boyle, E. H., & Spector, P. E. (2017). Best practices in developing, conducting, and evaluating inductive research. Human Resource Management Review, 27(2), 255–264. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar