Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T17:51:52.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond HR Competencies: Removing Organizational Barriers to Maximize the Strategic Effectiveness of HR Professionals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2017

Jennifer L. Geimer ,
Margaret Zolner  and
Kristin Sanderson Allen
Jennifer L. Geimer*
Affiliation:
CEB, Chantilly, Virginia
Margaret Zolner
Affiliation:
CEB, Boston, Massachusetts
Kristin Sanderson Allen
Affiliation:
CEB, Chantilly, Virginia
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jennifer L. Geimer, CEB, 4501 Singer Court, Suite 370, Chantilly, VA 20151. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The central question posed by Schiemann and Ulrich (2017) focuses on what human resources (HR) leaders need to know or do to deliver business results in the new work environment. Although understanding the knowledge and capabilities that successful HR professionals need is critical, the focal article places an overemphasis on the characteristics of individual HR leaders alone, without fully exploring the environmental inhibitors of their strategic effectiveness. In this commentary, we argue that competencies and the environment must be given equal attention to maximize impact on business and talent outcomes. We first describe the strategic competency gap among HR professionals and discuss four key organizational barriers that impede the strategic impact of HR on the business. We then offer recommendations for how industrial–organizational (I-O) psychologists and HR leaders can help remove these barriers to maximize strategic effectiveness.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 42 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the “strength” of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29 (2), 203–221.Google Scholar
CEB. (2007). Building next-generation HR-line partnerships: Optimizing HR business partner role and capability investment. Arlington, VA: Author.Google Scholar
CEB. (2012). Building bridges: Improving HR functional relationships (CLC Human Resources Report No. CLC4563312SYN). Arlington, VA: CEB.Google Scholar
CEB. (2013). Driving breakthrough performance in the new work environment (CEB Corporate Leadership Council Report No. CLC6286813SYN). Arlington, VA: Author.Google Scholar
CEB. (2014). Unlocking HR business partner performance in the new work environment (Report No. CLC8141714SYN). Arlington, VA: Author.Google Scholar
CEB. (2015). Creating enterprise leaders (Executive Briefing No. CLC1720715SYN). Arlington, VA: Author.Google Scholar
Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configural performance predictions. Academy of Management, 39, 802–835.Google Scholar
DeNisi, A., & Smith, C. E. (2014). Performance appraisal, performance management, and firm-level performance: A review, a proposed model, and new directions for future research. The Academy of Management Annals, 8, 127–179.Google Scholar
Ladika, S. (2014, September 17). The new power of collaboration. HR Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/news/hr-magazine/pages/1014-collaborativeedge.aspx Google Scholar
Leavy, B. (2005). A leader's guide to creating an innovation culture. Strategy and Leadership, 33 (4), 38–45.Google Scholar
Oltra, V. (2005). Knowledge management effectiveness factors: The role of HRM. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9 (4), 70–86.Google Scholar
Pulakos, E. D., Mueller Hanson, R., Arad, S., & Moye, N. (2015). Performance management can be fixed: An on-the-job experiential learning approach for complex behavior change. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8 (1), 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, K., Dorenbosch, L. W., & de Reuver, R. (2008). The impact of individual and shared employee perceptions of HRM on affective commitment considering climate strength. Personnel Review, 37 (4), 412–425.Google Scholar
Sanders, K., Shipton, H., & Gomes, J. F. S. (2014). Guest editors’ introduction: Is the HRM process important? Past, current, and future challenges. Human Resource Management, 53 (4), 489–503.Google Scholar
Schiemann, W. A., & Ulrich, D. (2017). Rise of HR—New mandates for I-O. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 10 (1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schooling, R. (2016, April). Why HR connectors succeed. Human Resource Executive Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.hrci.org/certified-community/certified-publication/featured-stories/the-art-of-human-resources Google Scholar
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (2016). What is distinctive about what psychologists can offer? Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/topminds1.aspx Google Scholar
Tan, C. L., & Nasurdin, A. M. (2010). Human resource management practices and organizational innovation: Assessing the mediating role of knowledge management effectiveness. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 9 (2), 155–167. Retrieved from www.ejkm.com Google Scholar