Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T12:30:45.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Been There, Bottled That: Are State and Behavioral Work Engagement New and Useful Construct “Wines”?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Daniel A. Newman  and
David A. Harrison
Daniel A. Newman*
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
David A. Harrison
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: 249 Psychology Building, College Station, TX 77843-4235
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 31 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University

**

Department of Management & Organization, Pennsylvania State University

References

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language (4th ed.). Retrieved July 30, 2007, from Dictionary.com Web site: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/engagement Google Scholar
Brayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 307–311.10.1037/h0055617Google Scholar
Burke, M. J., Brief, A. P., George, J. M., Roberson, L., & Webster, J. (1989). Measuring affect at work: Confirmatory analyses of competing mood structures with conceptual linkage to cortical regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1091–1102.10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1091Google Scholar
Harrison, D. A., Newman, D. A., & Roth, P. L. (2006). How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 305–325.10.5465/amj.2006.20786077Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 693–710.10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.693Google Scholar
Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 341–349.10.1037/0021-9010.67.3.341Google Scholar
Lodahl, T. M., & Kejner, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 24–33.10.1037/h0021692Google Scholar
Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 3–30.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.xGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538–551.10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538Google Scholar
Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247.10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1Google Scholar
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). Test manual for the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Unpublished manuscript, Utrecht University, the Netherlands. Retrieved from www.schaufeli.com.Google Scholar
Viswesvaran, C., Schmidt, F. L., & Ones, D. S. (2005). Is there a general factor in ratings of job performance? A meta-analytic framework for disentangling substantive and error influences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 108–131.10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.108Google Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063Google Scholar