Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:35:50.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ambiguity of Creativity and Innovation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Sandra Ohly  and
Carmen Binnewies
Sandra Ohly*
Affiliation:
Goethe University of Frankfurt
Carmen Binnewies
Affiliation:
University of Mainz
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Goethe University of Frankfurt, Mertonstr. 17, 60054 Frankfurt, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 360 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Institute of Psychology, Goethe University of Frankfurt; Institute of Psychology

References

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in the context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Binnewies, C., Ohly, S., & Niessen, C. (2008). Age and creativity at work: The interplay between job resources, age and idea creativity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 438–457.Google Scholar
Binnewies, C., Ohly, S., & Sonnentag, S. (2007). Taking personal initiative and communicating about ideas: What is important for the creative process and for idea creativity? European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 16, 432–455.10.1080/13594320701514728Google Scholar
Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., & Farr, J. (2009). A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 305–337.Google Scholar
Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 37–63.Google Scholar
Frese, M., Teng, E., & Wijnen, C. J. D. (1999). Helping to improve suggestion systems: Predictors of making suggestions in companies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1139–1155.Google Scholar
George, J. M. (2007). Creativity in organizations. The Academy of Mangagement Annals, 1, 439–477.Google Scholar
Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in organizational behavior, 28, 3–34.Google Scholar
Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., & Pluntke, F. (2006). Routinization, work characteristics, and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 257–279.Google Scholar
Rank, J., Pace, V. L., & Frese, M. (2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 518–528.Google Scholar
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933–958.Google Scholar
Unsworth, K. L. (2001). Unpacking creativity. Academy of Management Review, 26, 289–297.Google Scholar