Hostname: page-component-69cd664f8f-96srj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-12T09:48:38.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The AI revolution and the future of work hours: Reevaluating Keynes’ prediction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2025

Paresh Mishra  and
Gregory Lynn Hill
Paresh Mishra*
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Department of Organizational Leadership, Fort Wayne, USA
Gregory Lynn Hill
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Department of Technology, Leadership and Innovation, West Lafayette, USA
*
Corresponding author: Paresh Mishra; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 2025 , pp. 75 - 79
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. (2023). Generative AI at work. SSRN Electronic Journal, https://doi.org/10.3386/w31161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Meuse, K. P., Dai, G., & Hallenbeck, G. S. (2010). Learning agility: A construct whose time has come. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(2), 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschi, A., & Spurk, D. (2021). Striving for success: Towards a refined understanding and measurement of ambition. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 127, 103577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. A., Aitken, J. A., Allan, B. A., Alliger, G. M., Ballard, T., & Zacher, H. (2025). Revisiting Keynes’ predictions about work and leisure: A discussion of fundamental questions about the nature of modern work. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 18, 1–22.Google Scholar
Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023). Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science, 381, 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh2586 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oreg, S. (2003). Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (4), 612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rynes, S. L., & Gerhart, B. (1993). Recruiter perceptions of applicant fit: Implications for individual career preparation and job search behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 43(3), 310–327.Google Scholar