Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:49:25.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Age, Work Motivation, and the Potential for Age-Based Differential Validity for Personality Measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Donald M. Truxillo*
Affiliation:
Portland State University
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Department of Psychology, Portland State University, PO Box 751, Portland, OR 97207

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Psychology, Portland State University.

References

Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 126.10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.xGoogle Scholar
Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., & Piotrowski, M. (2002). Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 4351.10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.43Google Scholar
Bertolino, M., Truxillo, D. M., & Fraccaroli, F. (2008). Age as moderator of the relationship between proactive personality and self-efficacy, training motivation, and training outcomes. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Crant, M. J. (1995). The proactive personality scale and objective job performance among real estate agents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 532537.10.1037/0021-9010.80.4.532Google Scholar
Dudley, N. M., Orvis, K. A., Lebiecki, J. E., & Cortina, J. M. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 4057.10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.40Google Scholar
Ebner, N. C., Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2006). Developmental changes in personal goal orientation from young to late adulthood: From striving for gains to maintenance and prevention of losses. Psychology and Aging, 21, 664678.10.1037/0882-7974.21.4.664Google Scholar
Foldes, H. J., Duehr, E. E., & Ones, D. S. (2008). Group differences in personality: Meta-analyses comparing five racial groups. Personnel Psychology, 61, 579616.10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00123.xGoogle Scholar
Freund, A. M. (2006). Age-differential motivational consequences of optimization versus compensation focus in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 21, 240252.10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.240Google Scholar
Kanfer, R. (2009). Work motivation: Identifying use-inspired research directions. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 7793.Google Scholar
Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (2004). Aging, adult development, and work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 29, 440458.10.2307/20159053Google Scholar
Major, D. A., Turner, J. E., & Fletcher, T. D. (2006). Linking proactive personality and the Big Five to motivation to learn and development activity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 927935.10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.927Google Scholar
Morgeson, F. P., Campion, M. A., Dipboye, R. L., Hollenbeck, J. R., Murphy, K., & Schmitt, N. (2007). Reconsidering the use of personality tests in personnel selection contexts. Personnel Psychology, 60, 683729.10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00089.xGoogle Scholar
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2008). The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 392423.10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.392Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 327.10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1Google Scholar